Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | zedadex's commentslogin

Yeah, their comment read as incredibly privileged, and that paragraph pretty much said what they didn't have to


> Finally, the sheer obsession with money saddens me

You'd think they need it to live or something


> is an ad to buy a MAWA hat

There's no quicker way to get me to close a tab, aside from maybe just invoking window.close() yourself


> see from a mile away that this guy is trash

Actually possible, given the billboards lol


As a fan of tools like this and Eternal Jukebox, I cannot wait for the ones that have an option to request a cut specifically, like "from approximately this point, jump back to around this other point", while using the 'smart' features to line up the audio cuts (I'm sure stuff like that is built into the CC suite but I'm not springing that kind of money to recut a few of my tunes for personal listening ).

With Eternal Jukebox I was able to emulate it by setting the jump percent very high manually at the right time (but had to be paying attention + had to get lucky with which branch it took), whereas here I'll see if I can get it going by calculating what the cut I want would set the song length to, and requesting that length and fewest cuts. (Edit: didn't work)

Sometimes the simplest features are the easiest to overlook but most useful


> Over the last couple years, authorization (AKA “authz”) has become a hot topic of debate. Proponents of various authz frameworks, libraries, and philosophies have voiced their opinions on how it should be implemented, jockeying for position to become the de facto way to implement authz

As a developer of a tiny internal webapp - this is fascinating to read! I like to keep things as simple as possible, but as with anything our scope and use cases have grown over time.

Our authzn can handle some of this stuff - our rules, built atop our org's existing IAM, are very similar to these directed relationship tuples - but as we need to grow that out any further I'm excited to look into which aspects of ReBaC we're still missing.

Thanks for the link!


> This one takes the cake. They're dangling a carrot: hey, any low-ranked mod interested in taking over the subreddit for yourself? And they're still insulting everyone's intelligence

It's transparent, sure, but it doesn't mean it won't be effective. They're counting on a few people's greed plus most people's apathy.

reddit seems happy to go all in on the low-effort content mill market, and those users are the kind to get more upset over the protest than losing nice third-party apps or tools.


> Those 2,000 people are influencing what half a billion monthly active users think/believe

I'm not aware of reddit's admins having a large hand in curating site content, though I also haven't been heavily into reddit for a while.


I have a bit of nostalgia for all those 'share' buttons you'd see lined up on blog posts back in the day.


God, thank you. It's the absolute lowest-hanging fruit.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: