Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | za3faran's commentslogin

This came to mind when I saw that saying: https://sunnah.com/riyadussalihin:1844

When you look at it, you do notice how much of what is happening in that region was due to western (particularly British) intervention and colonialism, and continues to this day.

If you look at the history on Wikipedia there have been invasions and the like going back way before the Brits got in there. Eg.

>the clash between the kingdoms of Aksum and Himyar in 525 displayed a higher power struggle between Byzantium and Persia for control of the Red Sea trade. Territorial wars soon became common...

etc. And on likewise for over a thousand years.


By definition, usury/interest based banking is hostile against the customer.

Does the "modern world" mean watching their children get deliberately sniped time and time again (confirmed by many 3rd party sources)? Let alone their homes destroyed, land usurped, and then treated as non-humans. Yet again, comments like this shows how they are being dehumanized.

The hypocrisy is astounding. Even to this very day, how many Gazans have been slaughtered since the so called "ceasefire"? No one bats an eye.

The ironic thing is that golang itself is OO.


It is not. The only languages (that people have actually heard of, at least) that are OO are Smalltalk, Ruby, and Objective-C. Swift also includes OO features, enabled with the @objc directive, for the sake of backwards compatibility with Objective-C, but "Swift proper" has tried to distance itself from the concept.

Go channels share some basic conceptual ideas with message passing, but they don't go far enough to bear any direct resemblance to OO; most notably they are not tied to objects in any way.


golang allows for the same


Yes, many.


Where do you have proof that Hamas did not target only zionists? By the way, a large percentage of the deaths on oct 7 was due to the hasbara directive, in other words, done by the israelis themselves to their own.


> By the way, a large percentage of the deaths on oct 7 was due to the hasbara directive, in other words, done by the israelis themselves to their own.

Without taking a position in the underlying claim, which I am not interested in debating either way, I think you are conflating the Hannibal directive [0] and its alleged invocation on October 7 with the practice of hasbara [1] here.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannibal_Directive

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasbara


I meant hannibal directive, yes.


The proof is that they went in and started killing people at random.


That narrative has not been proven though. See: the hannibal directive.


You only need to look at what happened at Nova to prove it.


We did, that's why I was referencing the hannibal directive.


> many of the colonizers were fleeing persecution and, especially around the holocaust, had no nations willing to accept them as immigrants

So they take over someone else's land and massacre and displace the locals? Sounds about right /s


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: