Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | wds's commentslogin

I've found this dataset specifically for Home Assistant with over 32k examples: https://huggingface.co/datasets/acon96/Home-Assistant-Reques...


Funnily, I did fine tune Qwen 1.7B with this but learned this dataset is meant for the authors extension homeLLM


Assuming the entirety of history began on October 7th, 2023, this is true.


Go back further and it is more of the same. They fight and lose. Rinse and repeat.


Yes, I am aware of the Nakba, and how Palestinians fight to keep their land and lose.


Has there ever been another group of people that have lost so many existential wars in a row but still demand they keep their land?


the First Nations of North America


Do they keep bombing Washington?


They managed to hold onto Alcatraz for longer than anyone expected.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of_Alcatraz


How do you define this group of people? Most Palestinians have more of the blood of Abraham than the European Jews who displaced them. The idea that the Jews fled Palestine after the Romans conquered it is a myth that can be verified by genetic testing. Many stayed and Hellenized and then converted to Christianity and then converted to Islam. Now these people won't do the rational thing and "convert" back to Judaism to continue to stay in that land because of Pascal's wager and lack of education to see through it. For that, they have their land taken, are excluded from participating in the democracy that governs the country they live in, are starved, and are dehumanized.


https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/dammi-israeli-the-genetic-or...

"On balance it is fair to state that Palestinians are in fact ethnically Israelite. The divide between the Israelis and Palestinians is on religious and linguistic lines only."


Meanwhile, the current Israelis are mostly descended from Europeans (e.g. Germany, fleeing the Holocaust) and not from Israelites.


I was referring to the 47 War, 48 War, 67 War, 1987–1993 First Intifada, 2000–2005 Second Intifada, …


History is a funny thing, now that you mention it.

Should we start in 1948, when all of Israel’s neighbors invaded simultaneously? Or one of the other times Israel was invaded by their neighbors? Should we go back further and blame the Ottoman Empire for collapsing and causing a power vacuum in the region?


Let's go back one further to 1947 where there was no Israel, and it was all Palestine.


Do you mean the League of Nations Mandate for Palestine, administered by the British between 1920-1948 after the Ottoman Empire collapsed?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_Palestine


They mean the name that has been used for the region for much of human history.


How is that relevant?

Yes, the name Palestine is derived from the Philistines who used to inhabit the area 3500 years ago. The region has been urbanized for 7-9k years and inhabited by many different groups. Jews, Greeks, Romans, Muslims, and I’m sure there’s more. It has an exceedingly complex history.


And the name _Israel_ is derived from another Bronze Age tribe, from which Zionists draw the legitimacy of their project. Rather a fatuous question.


> where there was no Israel, and it was all Palestine

A British colony. Taken from the Ottomans.


For most of the kids falling over themselves in this conflict, history between the two nations began October 8th 2023.

For the adults that run the world and been around 50+ years watching this shit, they just want it to be over, and don't really care who wins. At this point Palestine has no cards left and no friends helping them. They have lost, and the adults want them to go away without human-shielding themselves to dust.


Go away where?


Iran. Israel would happily pay for first class cruises and flights for everyone.


Iran would not accept millions of refugees following a different religion (Sunni) from the dominant one (Shia) in its theocracy. Palestinians would not accept transport as payment for stolen property.


Maybe they should have thought about that before being their #1 sponsor.

But really any of their friends in the neighborhood should be willing to take them in.


They're not the ones who took their property. Why should they have to pay to compensate them?

Also, friend doesn't seem like the appropriate word to use here. Were Americans friends of the Contras?


>human-shielding

The '''adults''' are not the ones accepting this and other canards that Israel and their apologists keep bandying about.


Hamas doesn't issue uniforms to its soldiers, except for publicity shots and some small spec ops units.

This isn't even propaganda or anything, go watch footage from either side of the fighting.

Dressing your soldiers as civilians is in fact using "human shields".


Literally no human rights organization endorses this claim. Meanwhile, the IDF has been caught on video forcing civilians at gunpoint to enter combat zones ahead of them. This actually fits the definition of 'human shielding', but oddly, it doesn't factor into your calculus. So much for being an adult.


Why would I go to a third party when I can see the evidence directly? Both israelis and palestinians post raw footage on back channels.

You are pretty much saying "Don't look at the raw footage, listen to what these groups say instead"

No thanks, I favor primary sources.


Was my comment too long? I quite literally referenced raw footage in my second sentence; the point is that Israel uses a definition of human shields that only holds water with them and their apologists. And they don't even apply that bullshit definition to their own practices, contemporary or historical.


Do you have the address for the Hamas Dept of Defense HQ, or the present location of their leadership?


I have the address for the many IDF bases that are in residential neighbourhoods, as well as the schools from which their predecessors in the Irgun, Haganah and Lehi stored weapons and hid their soldiers.


And when hamas missiles are fired at bases and miss, most adults quickly forget. When hamas spends months planning a massacre at a rave, people give up caring about anything related to hamas.


How can anyone forget when it is introduced context-free literally every time an Israeli is held to account?


Keep in mind this was written by man.

People are being murdered thousands of years later because of the ancient Judea equivalent of 'Harry Potter', and the batshit insane people who still believe it in earnest.


Being dismissive of the Bible is not as cool as you think it is: those who do not study the Bible are doomed to repeat it.

I understand the instinct to treat Bronze‑Age literature like fanciful fiction: engineers are wired to put "myth" in one bucket and "hard data" in another. But for better or worse, the Bible isn't just an ancient novel. It's the source code for a huge fraction of the world's legal systems, ethics, holidays, and political claims, including the one we are discussing. Dismissing it as "Harry Potter" misses the point:

If we're serious about reducing violence, we need to debug the real code people are running in their heads, not the straw‑man version.


Software engineers are notorious for bikeshedding and pointlessly subjective "holy wars." Any belief in higher capacity for reason than their fellow man is sheer hubris.


[flagged]


Don't put words in my mouth. Unacceptable strawman.


No, they're being murdered thousands of years later because of the long history of bad blood between the two groups. The religious documents are just a pretext.


What level of privilege do I have to reach to have falsehoods be labeled 'discussion generators'?


Which falsehood are you referring to?


It may be perhaps splitting hairs, but this definitely seems like a case of "lying by omission" to me.

"She met Buffett herself, saw his genius, and made him her professor." would give any normal person reading this a completely false understanding of what actually happened.


I just couldn't tell if there was a dispute about Graham and Buffett's affair. The stuff I read was pretty specific; like, she'd toss him her house keys when he arrived at parties.


> I think we’re close to AI substantially contributing to scientific discovery.

The new "Full Self-Driving next year"?


"AI" already contributes "substantially" to "scientific discovery". It's a very safe statement to make, whereas "full self-driving" has some concrete implications.


"AI" here means language models. Machine learning has been contributing to scientific discovery for ages, but this new wave of hype that marketing departments are calling "AI" are language models.


Well I also think full self-driving contribute substantially to navigating the car on the street..


I know it’s a meme but there actually are fully self driving cars, they make thousands of trips every day in a couple US cities.


The capitalization makes it a Tesla reference, which has notoriously been promising that as an un-managed consumer capability for years, while it is not yet launched even now.


> in a couple US cities

FWIW, when you get this reductive with your criterion there were technically self-driving cars in 2008 too.


To be a bit more specific: no, they were not routinely making thousands of taxi rides with paying customers every day in 2008.


We can go further. Automated trains have cars. Streetcars are automatable since the track is fixed.

And both of these reduce traffic


I thought FSD has to be at least level 4 to be called that.


As an aside, that is happening in China right now in commercial vehicles. I rode a robotaxi last month in Beijing, and those services are expanding throughout China. Really impressive.


We have Waymo and AlphaFold.


Most individuals cannot afford to subsidize free-but-not-free API calls like companies can. BYOK is perfectly reasonable for a solo project like this.


If you say so.


"Anyone famous" in the vast, vast majority of cases is completely detached to the cause of anyone's death or further suffering as a health insurance CEO would be.


Yes but now you’re already bringing in a judicial review of the specific people and circumstances involved. You might as well have a regular homicide investigation.


Completely untrue.

>In this game, the player does not shoot Israeli civilians, women, children, elderly, only soldiers.


> based on playing as bad guys.

You gave it away.


Whatever’s your stance on the conflict, if you include Oct 7 as a playable mission AND you continue to play as the same guy throughout the game - you’re the bad guy.

It’s one thing to create imaginary world of freedom fighter fighting against tyranny of oppressive world hegemony of certain state and it is completely different thing to include some sort of Sep 11 event and then paint it as resistance.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: