Comments are closed in the article, and it's from 2019... But... How do you explain Google Reader then?
It was a super proof-of-work-oriented. The ones who used it where like gods of article sharing. I hade the best newsletters by persons I knew. And then one day... Poof. Whyyyy?
Am I the only one thinking through the reading of this: "Wait a minute... isn't this article some kind of weak X then Y also? Observation of many cases, with generalized causality concludes that he just feels like x should cause Y? hahaha. Love the article btw.
Also, the current AI advancements result from walking away from knowledge-semantic-logic AI methodologies into more statistics-generative approaches. This is also a result of those methodologies not working properly because of the unsolvable problem of infinite knowledge = infinite space (a HD/compute unsolvable problem) // Infinite divisibility / synthesis of knowledge (also a physical/compute/HD unsolvable problem. Right?
When I used it with ollama in the terminal (first try prompt: "create a snake game in HTML canvas", nothing else) it went forever rambling. It started with the right answer in HTML code, but then it started explaining, and started repeating itself, and then it started to put things like random code snippets and random explanations that were nonsense like:
```python
def solve_quadratic_equation(a, b, c):
"""Solves a quadratic equation of the form ax^2 + bx + c = 0."""
discriminant = (b ** 2) - (4 * a * a)
if discriminant >= 0:
root = (-b + math.sqrt(b ** 2 - 4 * a * a ** b**
0.5 #
1.
# Return None if the quadratic equation has no real roots
if (b ** 2) < (4 * c):
return None
# Calculate the roots using the quadratic formula
b = -b
b
# a, b): Solve for the discriminant.
# Handle the case of a complex discriminant
# Print the solution to the equation
if (b * 2)
print("The quadratic equation is: " + a * x* 2 + b "x" + c)
```
"One thing I like in an initial question is outrageousness. I love questions that seem naughty in some way — for example, by seeming counterintuitive or overambitious or heterodox. Ideally all three. This essay is an example. Writing about the best essay implies there is such a thing, which pseudo-intellectuals will dismiss as reductive, though it follows necessarily from the possibility of one essay being better than another. And thinking about how to do something so ambitious is close enough to doing it that it holds your attention."
