Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | stankondrat's commentslogin

Thanks for link!

""" Indeed we know in our hearts that they appeal to the weakest parts of human psychology, selfish, voyeuristic fantasies of omnipotence and omniscience. Yet they offer virtually no societal utility. """

Looks like the new toys my children want every day, but driven by their curiosity to explore the world.

> tragic waste of human and natural resources

People have solved major problems with technology: 5% of farmers can feed the world. There are no real visible challenges now. All problems are made to keep people on their toes to keep them moving. Otherwise, the heat death of the universe will come for humanity.


> > We're not here to produce things to be used, but rather things that increase usage! > That sounds exploitative and dystopian.

If "things" are considered as content too, TikTok users will use them, even though the videos on TikTok will be generated with AI.


Google Search seems like a finished product that has been making money for years without much investment in research. AI chat systems, however, are currently spending heavily on research and development, and it's unclear what the final product will look like or how AI will generate revenue in the end.


Interesting idea that Google Search will be the backend for ai chats.

Many AI services and crawlers scan sites more intensively than Google Search. I've seen this myself in Google Analytics.


> The "unethical" part is subjective so the manipulation doesn't get to me.

Good specialist engineers designed gas chambers in Nazi Germany


Apparently you're not supposed to make comparisons to Nazi Germany (Godwin's law if you want to be too-online about it); it's considered gauche I suppose. What's funny is that that strikes me as a really good rule to follow if you do in fact want to sleepwalk your society into an analogue of Nazi Germany.


Seeing as the closer in ideology you seem to have to be to make such claims, I don’t believe what you’re saying is true for a second.


Hello, interesting project! I scrolled through the pages of the site and read the patent, but it is still unclear to me: does the base station rotate the magnetic field (rotates a permanent magnet) or generate electromagnetic fields in different directions, or is the magnetic field of a static permanent magnet somehow overlapping in different directions 1000 times per second?

ps I won't sleep tonight until I understand how it works. :-)


Yes, the base station rotates the magnetic field, though the third option you mentioned sounds very futuristic. We could be a magnet-bender!

Feel free to ask us more questions so we can all sleep soundly tonight :)


My futuristic variant is that around a static magnet there are sections of coils (or a magnetic screens with a Foucault current) with compensation of the magnetic field in the opposite direction.

My last guess before going to bed was that there are three electromagnets facing different directions. They turn on one after another. The magnetic sensor measures each value over synced time. The software calculates the triangulation from these values.

Do you mechanically rotate a large neodymium magnet?


We thought about that kind of concept in the early stages. We may eventually experiment with it, but not at the moment. It's a very cool concept indeed.

And yes, we mechanically rotate a large magnet, creating a unique magnetic field that allows us to track all 6DOF with a single sensor via our proprietary algorithm. No triangulation is needed.


Thank you for the answers! Many years ago, in university, I made a magnetic compass without using ready-made chips. This topic brings back memories for me. This year, I’ll definitely experiment in my free time, as a hobby, trying to bend the magnetic field. :-)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: