Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | splix's commentslogin

I think the author means all dbs that fit a single server. Because in distributed dbs you often want to spread the load evenly over multiple servers.

To spell it out: it improves performance by avoiding hot spots.

We made a script to avoid such situations. It checks the dependencies, just by parsing the package.json (or the lock file), checking the relevant time on npm registry, and returns error if it finds a too fresh package added.

We run it on CI for each commit/PR, and if a developer tries to commit a change that updates a JS dependency to a too recent it prevents the build from running, and so on. Basically we expect that a Supply Chain attacks on NPM would be noticed in a couple of week, and we enforce this time window to our code.

See https://github.com/emeraldpay/paranoid.js


Ah, I had a similar situation with them. They also closed my personal account immediately after closing the business account. I was really surprised it works that way.


I think for the past couple of years he lives in France. By force, so it's not very straight to recognize it as a free or not.


He mentions on his recent Lex Fridman podcast episode[1] that he lives in Dubai, U.A.E. He expressed fear about France's actions against him.

1. https://youtu.be/qjPH9njnaVU


He does have a French passport (in addition to his other passports) but does not live there. This may be the source of the confusion.


I mean the arrest. But as I just learned [1] he is being allowed to make periodic travels to Dubai since recently. So things got better for him now, but that's just since July 2025. Before that he was physically staying in France since August 2024, which I would call as "living" as it's the place where he spent most of his time.

[1] https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250619-france-soften...


AFAIK the recommended way is to open a bank account through smaller banks (aka neobanks). They just send you a card to address specified and once you activated it you (first) get a bank account for payments and (second) can use it to prove address for others. Also, if you legally rent then you get the council tax documents, though it takes roughly a month for them to send. This is another proof of address. And the bills of course, but again it takes a month or so to receive the first letter.

So it's unclear how a digital ID solves anything in regarding the proof of address.


I'm wondering how did you ask for the links?

It supposed to search for actual documents and then process them (extract content, summarize, giving you the links, and so on).


Also, for SPA with SSR take a look at Double View https://github.com/emeraldpay/double-view

It's a React renderer that works on Java backend by using GraalVM, and then the same JS template continues to work in browser.


In the world where the non-questionable financial organizations decide who can access them or not, based on the place they were born at. I.e., the current world.


In the times of AI it's really easy to verify the question above. I had literally just copied it to the chat and made a research (also asked to cite and manually verified the links).

So it says there are 57 billionaires in UK with total worth of £182 billion. Non-billionaire wealth is £10.13 trillion, btw, so it's definitively not 50%. UK population is 68.3 million people. So everyone gets their £11,311 and that's it.

UPDATE there are £772.8 billions if you include non-UK citizens, but happen to live here. If you seize their money as well that will give you the total of £11K


It’s a straw man cause you don’t have a windfall redistribution as only option


That's different because in Bitcoin's case there was a clear violation of the specification, of how it supposed to work. So the bug was fixed to make the software working as it intended to be. If there were two node implementations then one would just stop to work until fixed.

In Ethereum's case there were no violation of any specification. In fact there were no bug in the blockchain itself. Just someone took founder's money, they didn't like it and so they decided to get them back. And note that after that, there were bugs in the nodes code that were breaking the spec (which you should compare to the bitcoin's bug), but because of multiple node implementations only some of the nodes stopped and so we don't care about those issues.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: