I looked this year and the site went nowhere. But now seems to be up. Not sure what happened.
But I just went through the eligibility steps and it requires id.me verification! Big nope. Mailing a paper form does not. Of course Uncle Sam figured a way to fuck it up.
At my last job, whenever a commit wouldn't build, we would blast it into a slack channel with an alert that included the comment and the name of the developer.
Ah yes. Public shaming. The “beatings will continue until morale improves” strategy of code development. Next time, you may want to suggest an evergreen strategy where commits are tested before they’re merged.
> DOGE may not be the right answer, but it's the first actual reduction in spending in my lifetime
On what timeline? The week of the first round of RIFs? The first month?
I assure you, as someone who works with in the space where DOGE has played, it will NOT be a reduction in costs in the long run. In fact, costs will go up because of the indiscriminate nature of "cost reduction". When the only people with knowledge of a system are removed, the remaining people cannot run it - no matter what AI they are given. At that point, you have to either hire back the people you fired, with a serious delay of important work, or you stumble for years until it can be figured out at the cost of delays, protests, lawsuits, whatever.
Considering firing everyone a reduction in costs is a shallow, short-term view.
We have some autonomous safety layers (comprised of object/human detection like you mentioned and others) even for remote teleop. But we haven't deployed autonomy on real sites yet. We still have some work to do before we can reliably deploy/test it out on the actual sites!
Safety is a huge concern with construction and really any operation that uses heavy equipment. I promise you they all know about Tesla autopilot running into people and will absolutely bring it up ad nauseum.
And I only say this because I think this is an interesting area to pursue so I hope you're successful with it. But a focus on safety will be of paramount importance.
I completely agree. If you have worked in the industry, I would like to talk to you and get your feedback on what I might be missing on my understanding in requirements in safety layers.
Would be great if we can chat on email: contact at useflywheel dot ai
If you take a look at what that tool is doing, it's all very hand waivey prompting that will sometimes work, but mostly not. You need to put agents on rails and the docs it produces are more like friendly suggestions.
Spoken like someone who hasn't tried one or perhaps both of those projects
Kiro is collaborative, but SpecKit is a bunch of templates and then wishes you good luck in your journey. It honestly reminds me of those unified process templates, which I guess all of those are great if one needs some structure to organize ones thoughts
As an alternative, SpecKit is also 0.x release so maybe in 9 months it'll be useful - or overcome by whatever 'ooh, shiny!' follows it
The Trump Administration is trying to get rid of it, but its been so successful and so well-rated that they're having trouble doing that.