Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sedgjh23's commentslogin

On a related note, for those interested, a quick about Peto’s Paradox was quite fun.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peto's_paradox


I think the romance of authenticity is something only old people like me got to experience e.g. the early days of thefacebook. It died a few short years(?) after when the algorithms took over.


Facebook died with the like button. Twitter died with retweets.


The early days of social media were indeed fun and 'innocent' - people shared stuff they liked with no ill intent but that didn't last long.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45222562 - this was posted yesterday; people back then hyped this "information superhighway" and from today's perspective it was adorably naive. What they couldn't predict or know was the malice we got some 15 years ago - hell, neither we could see that coming. We got social media that manipulate opinions and behavior, predatory ad industry that tracks us all around, and mobile devices that turns us into zombies. People often call for Orwell's 1984, less frequently for Huxley's Brave New World but we're living in a dystopian world right now and we're quite content with it.

Subscribe and hit that bell notification button for more content.


MiraLAX (or any of the generics) three times a week does this for me, and according to my doc is safe to drink for the rest of my life. Good luck soldier.


Just a heads up, the EcoBee doesn’t use a CO2 sensor, it just guesses what the value is. I have the same thermostat and was getting wildly different readings than my more expensive AirThings View Plus. Checked the EcoBee support website[1] and it made a lot more sense.

“Based on the VOC measurement, it can also estimate carbon dioxide (CO2) levels. The sensor doesn’t directly measure CO2 but assesses CO2 levels based on the average correlation between VOCs and CO2 in exhaled human breath.”

[1] https://support.ecobee.com/s/articles/air-quality-sensor-faq...


Which seems fair, because I live in a normal home with breathing humans and not an industrial setting where VOCs are produced in other ways.

How wildly off were the readings btw? And were you doing things related to VOCs? Which reading was erroneously under reported compared to actual, CO2 or VOC?


This is great, thanks for sharing!


This is excellent, thank you.


I was in the overeating column (4000+ calories a day, no sugar drinks) and going into month 3 I am fighting to hit 1500 every day except the day before shot day and shot day. YMMV of course, but it is very effective for me so far.


Even before AI, bots were inevitable. Take Reddit for example, bots farming karma in every large subreddit, indistinguishable to the average user. I think the concept of an implicitly trusting public square is mostly gone and it’s probably the smart thing to be very skeptical of what you’re reading/interacting with. Nowhere with a text input field has been safe for a long time. With recent developments in AI, audio, images, and video are out the window too.

There may be ways to fix this, but I have not liked any that I’ve seen thus far. Identity verification is probably the closest thing we’ll get.


Ancient footage, they fixed this bug


It's sort of on you to back up the extraordinary claim that these defects have disappeared in the last five months.

Edit: FSD 9 accelerates across double lines toward bridge support in San Francisco. https://youtu.be/GlIdu7prsAw?t=155


For anyone wondering what "ancient" means - it was 5 months ago. Maybe the commenter has a different definition of ancient than me.


Like it's just a forgotten semicolon which explains all this behaviour. This isn't 'a bug', it's a big, complex, systemic reliability problem.


they said most, not all


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: