Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | saubeidl's commentslogin

There is a certain proto-fascist contingent here that sees it to their duty to stifle all discussion critical of the regime.

He was shot eleven times to the back of his head.

>eleven times to the back of his head

Please stop making up stuff.



Pro-Regime enforcers exist in the digital world as well.

21st century brownshirts, if you will.


Exactly. You're disproving your own argument now.

How so? When I said "every political party" meaning including the ones under the liberal democratic umbrella.

Yes, but also the ones on the way to authoritarianism, as was argued the Trump regime is.

Thus, currently allowing some criticism is not enough to disprove the alleged march towards fascism. People with that viewpoint would argue that it's only allowed because power isn't consolidated enough yet.


>Yes, but also the ones on the way to authoritarianism, as was argued the Trump regime is.

Democrats/leftists/ANTIFA don't hate authoritarianism, They hate that they're not the ones in charge of dealing the authoritarianism on their opposition, as shown by the masked mob gestapo they set up in Minnesota doing "papers please, you're either with us or against us" on civilians passing by to confirm they hate ICE.

If Kamala-Walz would have won the election, they would have done the same to Trump and friends in republican states, and you would have called it "justice for Nazis", not fascism ,which is the justification ANTIFA use when they beat up innocent people.


> as shown by the masked mob gestapo they set up in Minnesota doing "papers please, you're either with us or against us" on civilians passing by to confirm they hate ICE.

[citation needed]

Also even if true, there's a vast difference between a rando on the street asking those questions vs a government agent. That's assuming the government agent isn't too much of a pussy to identify himself instead of hiding behind a mask.


More Americans support than oppose abolishing ICE.

The Gestapo, too, was federal agents enforcing federal law.

https://today.yougov.com/politics/articles/53939-more-americ...


Like Alex Pretti?

[flagged]


Maybe we shouldn’t have a system where these happen.

[flagged]


You think the appropriate punishment for interfering with a simple administrative act is gunshots to the back of the head? Are you even reading what you're saying???

Police have the right to defend themselves if they fear for their lives. It was terrible accident indeed that could have been voided if he'd not physically interfere or have a gun on him.

Defend themselves from the already pinned down person that never drew a gun by shooting him to the back of the head?

Think about what you're saying. You're trying to defend the indefensible.


Police heard a gunshot and pulled the trigger by accident. Hence unfortunate accident.

Pulled the trigger by accident eleven times???

Come on man, don't debase yourself like this.


Yes, police are trained to always fire multiple shots at threats.


Shooting somebody that is already constrained is an execution, not an accident.

It's what fascist regimes do to anyone they deem noncompliant.


[flagged]


Nobody assaulted anyone. Shooting somebody that is already on the ground in the back of their head is not self defence. ICE is not law enforcement.

Impressively, you managed to misrepresent a fact with every single word in your sentence.


US laws, hmm.

Wasn't there something about an amendment to their constitution? I believe it might've even been the first? Something about freedom of speech?

Maybe I'm just misremembering, but I could've sworn conservatives kept harping on about it.


The Constitution is silent on the matter of the cutting room floor and Ellison lawnmowers.

It only restricts the Federal government (later extended to state governments IIRC?)

This is one of many reasons Federal government is now partnered with private business.


Did you have the same concerns when Biden's DoJ was colluding with social media to censor narratives they didn't like politically?

https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/google-admi...


You mean "politely asking social media to censor narratives, with the implied force of the federal government if they choose not to comply." Which every administration has done since social media became a thing.

[flagged]


Generally speaking, threats and calls to violence are legal. Only a subset are illegal.

[flagged]


Possibly the police will come bother you, but you're not being convicted.

You should use Google and try to understand what the person you’re replying to is saying. Because they’re correct and there’s a nuance to it under the law.

It's being stifled by their own government. US TikTok has been taken over by a government-linked oligarch.

IBM built machines to help organize the Holocaust.

Apple's locked down ecosystem is enabling the rollout of Digital ID which will eventually be required for Internet access and age verification law. This is why Google is locking down their ecosystem now too.

If anyone else wants the closest thing to a MBP running Linux without waiting for Asahi to fully work, I can highly recommend the HP ZBook G1A.

* It has an all-aluminium chassis that feels a lot like a MBP.

* Hardware all works - fingerprint reader, webcam, suspend etc etc. Takes a bit of work, but all works in the end. Helps that HP ships them with Ubuntu as official option.

* Strix Halo chipset, which is basically AMD's attempt at an Apple Silicon type design. Single big chip, with unified LPDDR5X-8000 RAM (up to 128GB!) shared between CPU and GPU (which is surprisingly strong as well, 40 CU!). This thing is a beast for local LLMs!

Only downside really is the battery life. I haven't played around with it too much, I think there's a bit more room with custom tuned profiles, but rn I get like maybe 6 hours on a good day?


I also have an Apple M4 MacBook Pro from Work and an HP ZBook G1a for my personal. I used to have an Asahi MacBook but switched over with the lack of M3/M4 support. Some extra compare/contrast:

- The build quality of each are excellent. The touchpad on the G1a is probably the closest to a MacBook touchpad I've seen and it even manages to boast an OLED screen. On the other hand, the G1a is only available as a 14" option.

- Strix Halo will still leave you wishing it were Apple Silicon in pretty much every case except "I need to run a x86 native app/VM". It's certainly the best alternative, but you definitely trade away to go to it. You can load large LLMs (I have the 128 GB version for non-AI reasons) but they only run ~3x faster than a laptop without a GPU would because 256 GB/s still ends up being a big bandwidth limit. If you do actually do this regularly, then prepare to hear the fans and look for your power adapter as it does get quite hot doing so.

- Speaking of power adapter... you need either a 100 W or 140 W charger + USB C to be able to charge the G1a while you use it. If you want to use a lower wattage adapter you need to power off, or it seems to draw 0 W out of spite.

- It's massively refreshing to have a normal UEFI bootup process, and as long as you have a current kernel the hardware support is indeed pretty great on the G1a. Between the two, the G1a has better supported than the M1 w/ Asahi - as one would expect for a corporation officially supporting Linux vs a fan project.

If I were to do it all again, I'd say I might have either just gotten an M2 Pro for Asahi or an M4 w/ macOS and a Linux VM as needed. Part of going for an x86 laptop was to be able to dual boot into games with strict DRM, but after trying multiple versions of AMD graphics driver for the 8060s it was more a frustration in random stutters and I ended up not gaming on it as much as I have on other laptops anyways. Bazzite does work great though, just not with all of the different DRMs or games.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: