Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | raverbashing's commentslogin

Or, you know, just less obese people

We have quite a few obese people. Not as many as the US, but not few either.

> France [...] 2020 [...] excess weight was 47.3%, with 17% of subjects being obese

https://presse.inserm.fr/en/obesite-et-surpoids-pres-dun-fra...


Many of my not obese friends started using it out of pure laziness. But in general I believe that obese factor too :)

> Electronics is dominated by old dudes, the industry is hostile to newcomers, self-taught people, women, and more. But by making an effort to give people who are starting a good experience, we can turn this around.

Completely agree.

Then the Semi industry wonders why they're running out of people


>Then the Semi industry wonders why they're running out of people

Yes but they make up with via immigration of candidates on visa. Last time I worked in semi, about 30% of colleagues were on visa from abroad. Today from former collogues still there, I hear it's close to 50%.


> I then proceed to give them the example of N=100 doors, opening 98 others, leaving their pick and another closed and then asking them whether that makes a difference.

Yeah this is the way I found it the easier to understand intuitively


It's easy to dismiss the most obvious cases where EvD is wrong

But I think the basic idea, by itself is harder to dismiss

Archeology by itself is always going to have limitations, and there are vast swatches of history we are almost completely ignorant about

EvD is certainly guilty of taking himself much more seriously than the evidence suggests. But there's always going to be that "what if"


>But I think the basic idea, by itself is harder to dismiss

Its an unproven hypothesis.

It doesnt need to be "dismissed" it needs to be proven. You could make up any number of hypotheses. You wouldnt "dismiss" any of them. If you were interested in one you might design a test to prove it. But failing that its not worth worrying about.

When you write like 49 books trying to convince people of your untested claim, it seems like grifting instead of working towards evidence.


Why do you need evidence to write books about a hypotheses you have? Many people do that. And I think he never claimed to know the truth about it, he was just presenting his ideas of how it could be.

You don't have to agree with it. But the lack of evidence doesn't disprove the hypothesis. Yes it doesn't prove it either.


You can write as many books as you like. But if you spend all your energy trying to convince people of your unproven hypothesis, rather than testing and proving that hypothesis, no one has to take you seriously.

Existence of extra-solar-system planets was an unproven hypothesis until the 90's but of course anyone could take a guess at its probability.

Yes, and the proponents of that hypothesis built tests to prove their hypothesis. Thats good. They never demanded I take it on faith.

Sure - it was considered a near certainty planets orbited other stars given all that was known about the formation of our solar system.

That said, it's still an extremely low probabilty that life from other systems came and visited our particular rock some time in the past million years (and interacted with humans).


> But I think the basic idea, by itself is harder to dismiss

Speak for yourself. I find it very easy to dismiss.

Just as I find easy to dismiss horoscopes, creationism, anti-vaxers, global warming denialism, etc.


Some things you can easily dismiss with the proof of the opposite or something conflicting. But some parts of the hypothesis can't be either disproofed or proofed.

You could personally dismiss it, but you can't proof your point either. Like general archeology says humanity is only as old as the oldest evidence of it ever found, and some pseudo scientific hypothesis might say humans are older. You can't prove or disprove that. But you can't prove or disprove either that humanity is exactly as old as the oldest evidence we have. But when some older bones are discovered then you have proof that humanity is at least that old.

So yeah, absence of evidence doesn't disprove the hypothesis.


Strawman. Thanks for proving that "skeptics" are very happy to use fallacies as well

The first comment on the link is much more helpful than the article

https://lwn.net/Articles/1053131/

(yes it seems that comments are subarticles)


1 is correct. You can't expect the person to get better when promoted, rather you move them to the job they are already (almost) doing

Ideally with increased autonomy and decision-making ability that makes them more effective.

The UK once had a ministry specialized on that /s

Maduro is a coward and has no military power

People here saying it's "unjustified" should go and talk to a displaced Venezuelan.


It might be welcome by the majority of Venezuelans (nor not, depending what’s next) but it is not justified in a US domestic sense or indeed by international law

Why talk only to displaced Venezuelans though? If you want meaningful data, your sample shouldn't be biased. What is the overall proportion of Venezuelans supporting this action?

The vast majority of Venezuelans voted for his opponent in the last election, which is widely considered to have been stolen by Venezuelans and the international community: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Venezuelan_presidential_e...

There have been widespread protests in Venezuela throughout Maduro’s regime, but especially after the election.


The question isn't how many Venezuelans oppose Maduro, but rather how many Venezuelans wanted US to invade their country to oust him.

There are videos of Venezuelans celebrating in the streets, singing in large groups, cheering. I saw a video of someone from a balcony and it sounded like the entire city of Caracas was cheering. You can wait a few years for a survey or throw one up yourself.

The reaction I'm seeing from second-hand and direct reddit comments from actual Venezualans seems really positive.


Your attempts to sounding smart only betray a profound ignorance of the current state of things in Venezuela

I keep seeing this argument in here, but no one seems to point at any actual Venezuelans or message boards or whatever to support the point. Personally I only know a couple, classmates from decades ago who are FB friends and while they don’t support Maduro IIRC, I also don’t see any posts celebrating this great victory for the people. Who knows, maybe they’re partied out.

Maduro is a piece of shit.

But a military invasion of another country to commit regime change is literally what Russia tried to do to Ukraine.

America has blood on it's hands yet again.

EDIT: If the reports are true that Maduro has been captured and the fighting stops, then that's the best resolution one could hope out of this horrible situation. I pray for the Venezuelan people.


Right, and that's what the Allies did in Germany in 1945. I don't think it's helpful to paint everything with such a broad brush.

Russia is trying to annex Ukraine. They took part of it in 2014, then came back for more, and then organized sham annexation referendums in the regions they did control. Whatever the US is trying to achieve in Venezuela, it's probably not that. All war is deplorable, but some lead to good outcomes and some to bad ones.


> Russia is trying to annex Ukraine

And to start with they were trying to achieve this through regime change via a "surgical" (by their standards) strike on the government and capital.

That failed.

America is doing this explicitly to take control of Venezuela's resources. It's no different.


> Whatever the US is trying to achieve in Venezuela, it's probably not that

Presumably we're only trying to annex their oil reserves


Going to change your tune now that Trump has said that the US will run Venezuela? They’re not even pretending. This is far far more similar than it is different.

No, what Russia has tried to do to Ukraine is annex it as part of Russia. Not nearly the same, even if both are reprehensible.

The critical reaction is from the people on the Venezuelan street tomorrow.

I'm old enough to remember people in Iraq cheering for the fall of Saddam. Didn't make it great.

I’m naively hopeful that they will band together without more bloodshed. I worry though

Either the Venezuelan people demand new elections or a Maduro faction member succeeds him with the support of the military.

Some regimes deserved to be changed (and of course there are second order consequences)

I know some sheltered academics on Epstein's list disagree with that but that's a hill I will die on


Chomsky's argument was never that "no regime deserves to be changed", so maybe academic skills come in useful when comprehending arguments, books, and hills.

They only know how to follow the manual

Good, another reason to seize them

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: