I get it and somehow also agree with the division (thinker/builder) but I feel this is only the representation of a new society where less humans are necessary to think deeply.
No offense here, it's just my own unsatisfacted brain trying to adapt to a whole new era.
You just produced a layoff my friend. And after the sarcasm we all could agree this is gonna be happening everywhere in a matter of months and we will be horrified by the lack of empathy and the industry situation and blablabla but at the end this story is the representation of a truth, not many of us will end our working life in this industry. It's over, take it or leave it.
Agreed. The devs that don’t see the writing on the wall are going to be very disappointed. They are the ones screaming “AI slop” on every post on the internet. It’s the farmer that once said “tractors and machines will never replace me” only to be unemployed and bitter a few months/years later.
If we don’t adapt, we will not survive. I know this is a hard pill to swallow because we all thought we were set for life with job security and high paying jobs forever. This is changing fast or maybe already changed.
Lots of uncertainty and no one knows how this will pan out. The optimist in me thinks/hopes that new doors will open shrug
Valid-sounding argument, but ultimately irrelevant in the medium term. In fact, converting civilian traffic to EVs makes it a lot easier to ration fuel for military uses in emergencies.
It's been an issue since WW2 that there's very little oil on the European continent. That's why Germany planned to seize Azerbaijan in the first place.
Looking at the Russo-Ukrainian war, battery-powered drones seem to be more important than tanks right now. Russia, famously, had a lot of tanks; now, Oryx has a lot of their metal carcasses. Gone are the days of mass T-34 attacks that decided entire wars.
I will concede your point on heavier aircraft, though.
Between zero fossil and full fossil there's a world of nuances, too often ignored. How much oil are those heavier aircraft using, as percentage of the whole country usage? The difference is the answer needed.
It is not just oil, but the necessity to keep up the entire separate infrastructure for its refining, processing, storage and distribution.
Imagine a world where the railroad, for some reason, is still stuck with steam engines and black coal. Everything else moved on, but they cannot, thus keeping the mines open etc. Very uncomfortable and far from optimal.
We still have coal mines open, what do you mean? For less and less uses, yes, but they still have their uses, and we are not (nor should be) judging them for that.
The last coal mine in my country just closed a few days ago, 244 years after mining started. I am a bit influenced by this, because I live in that region.
Everyone with any military training has been laughing at how bad Russia was using their tanks, thus allowing them to be destroyed. Losing some tanks in battle is a given, but it is generally believed that if Russia was using tanks according to the Soviet doctrine they knew well they would not have lost near as many - as proof of that Thesis, Ukraine has been using the Soviet doctrine and not lost nearly as many tanks. (Ukraine lacks enough artillery to apply the Soviet doctrine of war which is why they are using drones - they have now developed new styles of fighting that uses the drones they have, but tanks are still an important part of war)
Tanks are the heavy cavalry of the modern era, their main use is to break defensive lines.
Or rather, was. Neither the Russians nor the Ukrainians, operating diverse tanks on the bases of different doctrines, managed to do much breaking with them. The battlefield of today is just too different and much more hostile to anything that moves in the open and is big and slow enough to get hit.
It turns out that if you aren't deluded by culture war superficialities, energy efficiency is an advantage on the battlefield. Presumably this Prius on treads is confusing to chickenhawks who conflate "Likes" on Facebook and Instagram with military supremacy.
You can see the fear all around this thread. And, tbh, it makes total sense.
There is nothing we can do to stop this dropping ball, we can accept it or leave the room but the industry has changed for all of us. I mean, you can use it one way or another but the concept of critical thinking is our only survival tool if your relaying on a it job this days. How long it will last? Who cares, we're fucked anyways...
The challenge is not the total energy generated by solar, but the instantaneous power capacity. The grid collapses if supply does not perfectly match demand in real-time
reply