Hyprland works with nvidia just fine with minimal coniguration, just as well as any other wayland compositor I've tried, and I have a very old card. Having out of date packages is going to be an issue on Ubuntu for software in general, but probably sway would be better to try.
There is also scroll (sway fork) and plugins for hyprland. Scrolling experience was not actually better in niri vs. others in my experience just because it was built around it. I tried to use niri, but there is too much missing functionality I want compared to hyprland and also worse power consumption.
Workspaces are not bound to displays in hyprland. This is one major reason I'm using hyprland over niri, where it's not really possible to work around that issue.
Every monitor has its own set of workspaces. Workspace 4 on display A is not the same as Workspace 4 on display B is not the same as Workspace 4 on display C.
Functionally you can focus any workspace on any monitor, and ids do not change when doing that. You can set things up both ways, but it's actually easier to just have a key focus workspace x on the current monitor than to lock workspaces to specific monitor.
I never looked at karabiner's full functionality, but kanata is the closest thing to a linux version of QMK. It can kind of be used for hotkeys, but that's really not its purpose. Better to use a separate hotkey daemon.
Keyboard Maestro would be replaced by one or more completely different tools. There are programs that allow application-specific mapping. I've never seen the point of it, so I can't comment if any of them are any good. What are you looking to do? As someone who uses the keyboard for everything, my experience so far has been that macOS is much weaker at this.
Keyboard mapping is fine on macOS (though most of those posts seem related to software or functionality I would never use). Keyboard-only experience is a lot more than keyboard mapping.
Consider window management, for example. If we're talking about using the keyboard for nearly everything, window management is one of the most fundamental parts of interacting with a computer. Linux has dozens of keyboard-based tiling window managers. You have only a few options on macOS, and they are all weak by comparison. Yabai is passable if you partially disable SIP so it can manage spaces, but it still has pretty limited functionality compared to herbstluftwm and bspwm (which is what it's mimicking) and feels hacky.
Similarly, cli tools are very popular on linux, and it is very easy to bind keys to them. Luckily a lot of tools work on both linux and mac, but this is not always the case. Replicating my global hotkeys has been an annoyance on macOS in some cases because of this. In linux, you have control of and multiple options for basically everything (e.g. bootloader, what you use for networking, what you use for notifications, etc.). In the case of notifications, on linux I can just bind a key to "dunstctl close-all" to close all notifications or "dunstctl history-pop" to show old notifications. My notification daemon is designed with scriptability in mind. If I want to have a similar keybinding on macOS I have to go through an arduous process of trying to find some up-to-date applescript snippet that actually works and isn't slow (couldn't find one that met either requirement) or learn to use some other automation tool. Unlike the WM case, I'm sure it's possible, it's just that macOS is just very clearly not designed with the use-case of keyboard for everything in mind. It can still support it very well, but with linux I can have it so that non-keyboard-friendly software just doesn't exist on my system. I don't need to workaround it.
Thanks, I'm aware of kanata, though haven't properly investigated it yet, the one area where it can beat Kara+ is if it implemented non-delayed based home row mods (though that's still an open issue; don't remember whether QMK supports it perfectly or also with delays, but a software solution to this would be much appreciated for all the laptops).
The low-level remapping and higher level app-specific and context-aware functionality is the Holy Grail that's still unachievable in any system, unfortunately, so that's why I specifically asked about the combo
> What are you looking to do
There are way too many interactions for me to list, it's anything from disabling all shortcuts when you play a game to quitting Insert text editor mode when you hold I, to making chord-based command menus with visual cues in apps that don't support anything like that, to inserting special symbols with helpful popups that only popup if you stumble and forget which key is next, to showing a palette with apps to launch with single keys without having to remember all those keys
You simply can't achieve it only via QMK-low-level approach
Kanata supports early tap-hold dispatch based on key overlap, which is all I need. There's an open issue for more advanced conditions: https://github.com/jtroo/kanata/issues/128
The maintainer has been very responsive in my experience and would probably add more advanced conditions if someone wanted them.
> There are way too many interactions for me to list
Sounds like mostly hackarounds for non-keyboard-friendly software. I generally prefer to use keyboard-friendly software (of which there is no shortage on linux) and just make application-specific keybindings directly in each application. Anything else is inevitably a hack. Window management, browsing, anything related to text or programming, etc. all have good keyboard-friendly options. I have to use some stuff like excel and teams for work, but I'll just use the mouse more in those cases. I don't spend a significant amount of time dealing with applications like that though, and e.g. for Teams I'd try set up a matrix bridge or just use warpd before trying anything else.
Teams no longer supports linux, but for other apps that have non-customizable key shortcuts, it's definitely possible hack around that and create your own in linux. E.g. When I used to use libreoffice regularly, I set up modal keybindings that sent the corresponding chords to libreoffice.
As long as I can use my editor to type anything non-trivial, I'm good. For example, you have generic software like sketchyvim on mac to essentially use vim in any input field. I don't think there's a linux equivalent that lets you essentially embed an editor like vim inside any input field, but you can use a generic keybinding to open one and then have the text sent back when you're done.
A lot of the examples you list don't seem to need any app-specific or context-aware functionality (e.g. your launcher example). I don't have enough of an idea of what you actually want to know if what's available on linux would support your use cases, but in addition to the numerous basic hotkey daemons there are programs like keyszer that support application-specific keybindings ootb or hawck which is scriptable in lua and supports conditional keybindings (allowing you to script per-application keybindings). You have some context available but only what is externally available, i.e. unless the program provides some way to interact with it like a cli utility or ipc socket, all you're going to be able to do is send input to it.
> Sounds like mostly hackarounds for non-keyboard-friendly software. I generally prefer to use keyboard-friendly software (of which there is no shortage on linux) and just make application-specific keybindings directly in each application.
No way, that's an almost non-existing class of apps. Which "keyboard-friendly software" supports the differentiation between tap and hold? Hold delays? Simultaneous keypresses? Arbitrary alpha key modifiers (hold T for Toolbar and tap 1,2,3 select different types of brushes in your image app)? Support for custom notifications? Knows left from right? Supports chords, not just combos, including single-key shortcuts? Basically, every app would need to add karabiner/katana as a library and slap app-specific contexts on top of that. Which apps do that???
> Anything else is inevitably a hack.
It's also the only way to make something great. There is no "native" OS/app development platform that matches that power, so it's very rare for an app to implement anything advanced on its own
> for other apps that have non-customizable key shortcuts
But it's not a binary, even apps that offer customizable key shortcuts, mostly offer underpowered versions nowhere close to what a keyboard remapper can offer.
> When I used to use libreoffice regularly, I set up modal keybindings that sent the corresponding chords to libreoffice.
But presumably you wouldn't want to send those shortcuts outside of Libreoffice, right? So you key remapper has to be app-aware
> sketchyvim on mac to essentially use vim in any input field.
This is great and I wish all OS had this basic functionality of allowing users to use their advanced text editing tools anywhere (there is also a more limited browser-only, but cross-platform extension GhostText)
> I don't think there's a linux equivalent that lets you essentially embed an editor like vim inside any input field, but you can use a generic keybinding to open one and then have the text sent back when you're done.
Sure, also you can always copy&paste, but that's friction, so not very suitable for smaller edits. Though maybe you can set a keybind that would instantly open a specially configured editor with a very small window size (basically, the size of a text field) without any extra visual stuff like gutter etc.?
> A lot of the examples you list don't seem to need any app-specific or context-aware functionality (e.g. your launcher example)
All of them do, e.g., app launcher requires the contexts of the app state. If the app is in the foreground, it will hide it, if it's in the background, it'll show it, if the app isn't not launched, it'll launch it.
> keyszer
that's only X11
> hawck which is scriptable in lua
thanks for tip, Autohotkey which it aims to replace is great (and lua is better, though also not a great scripting language), so this would be something like Hammerspoon on a Mac. That would still fall short of Keyboard Maestro with its GUI where you can much easier find he available actions and stich them together
> You have some context available but only what is externally available
> No way, that's an almost non-existing class of apps. Which "keyboard-friendly software" supports the differentiation between tap and hold? Hold delays? Simultaneous keypresses? Arbitrary alpha key modifiers (hold T for Toolbar and tap 1,2,3 select different types of brushes in your image app)? Support for custom notifications? Knows left from right? Supports chords, not just combos, including single-key shortcuts?
It would be cool, but I just don't see any of this as necessary. What I use supports single-key shortcuts, modality, and modifier shortcuts, and I wouldn't need anything else. Emacs and probably vim support arbitrary key combos and some more advanced functionality with timeouts, but I don't use those features. Even at the global level, I don't use tap-hold on alpha keys or arbitrary combos. It seems like these extra features are primarily useful as workarounds for having a bad keyboard. Normal modifiers are good enough for me. There are already plenty of actions available using just single keys and modifier keys, and modifier keys are comfortable on a good keyboard (even on my personal laptop I have 8 comfortable thumb keys). "hold T for Toolbar and tap 1,2,3" seems like a comparably painful/inefficient chord, and I'm not using software designed primarily with mouse interaction and things like toolbars in mind.
> But it's not a binary, even apps that offer customizable key shortcuts, mostly offer underpowered versions nowhere close to what a keyboard remapper can offer.
I'm definitely biased in that I'm a software engineer and am not working with graphical applications like photoshop. 95% of my time is spent using tools that are programmable and intended to be used primarily with a keyboard or at least have first-class support for it.
> there is also a more limited browser-only, but cross-platform extension GhostText
firenvim can also actually embed vim in browser input fields regardless of OS. Vim is really the only option still if you don't want an external window though.
> Though maybe you can set a keybind that would instantly open a specially configured editor
Right, there are things like emacs-everywhere that can be globally bound and will automatically handle the "syncing." Probably there are similar plugins for other editors but nothing universal I'm aware of.
> All of them do, e.g., app launcher requires the contexts of the app state. If the app is in the foreground, it will hide it, if it's in the background, it'll show it, if the app isn't not launched, it'll launch it.
I have global keybindings for all my most used applications that support toggle/dropdown functionality. I don't really use enough applications to need a launcher that does this, but you can at least implement this using external context only. It would be easy to script something like this on linux, but it would be X11-specific (e.g. tdrop + maybe rofi) or window manager-specific.
> That would still fall short of Keyboard Maestro with its GUI where you can much easier find he available actions and stich them together
Only if you're a fan of GUI configuration. I'd much rather have no GUI at all and just good documentation.
> It's also the only way to make something great. There is no "native" OS/app development platform that matches that power, so it's very rare for an app to implement anything advanced on its own
> > You have some context available but only what is externally available
> That's a very common limitation unfortunately
It certainly would be nice if all software was integrated at the level where you could access and work with internal state. It's why I'm using Emacs for nearly everything, but then you're stuck with whatever limitations/flaws the system has, so there are tradeoffs. If you like having options, it's nice that linux has so many Desktop Environment choices and dozens of really good window managers. By comparison, if you like tiling window managers, macOS is not great. Yabai is passable but requires partially disabling SIP or else it can't even manage/switch spaces. On the other hand, a lot of hammerspoon functionality is missing on linux. Linux will probably never have any good generic automation tools. X11 at least has some more advanced, generic tools like xdotool, but this is currently impossible with Wayland, and definitely nothing supports both. Anything more advanced than input like window management is wm/compositor-specific currently on Wayland, so if anything, linux is going backwards wrt generic keyboard/automation tooling.
> I'm not using software designed primarily with mouse interaction and things like toolbars in mind.
> I don't use those features.
> Even at the global level, I don't use tap-hold on alpha keys or arbitrary combos.
But I do! Hence my question specifically about tools that match the power of the ones I use that allow the use of a broader class of apps than just emacs
> It seems like these extra features are primarily useful as workarounds for having a bad keyboard. Normal modifiers are good enough for me.
> "hold T for Toolbar and tap 1,2,3" seems like a comparably painful/inefficient chord, and
It's specifically chosen for the T mnemonic (thumb B for toolBar is also fine), which is easier to remember than the more convenient thumb mods, so works better for less frequently used functions
> There are already plenty of actions available using just single keys and modifier keys
Only if you significantly constraint app universe!
> probably vim support arbitrary key combos
Vim doesn't even support left vs right modifiers
> 95% of my time is spent using tools that are programmable and intended to be used primarily with a keyboard or at least have first-class support for it.
That's not first-class, that would be power+usability, and none offer that, you can get to power with a lot of effort and using other tools
> I have global keybindings for all my most used applications
Globals interfere with some uber-global fullscreen apps which you don't want to accidentally interrupt.
> Only if you're a fan of GUI configuration. I'd much rather have no GUI at all and just good documentation.
Or if value your time, for a lot of these functions it'd take much longer reading the docs/writing scripts
> If you like having options, it's nice that linux has so many Desktop Environment choices and dozens of really good window managers.
I like having good options, so having many subpar ones doesn't help. Hence the original question, it takes a lot of time having to review and find limitations of the various options, so thanks for the tips
> linux is going backwards wrt generic keyboard/automation tooling.
Delays are a terrible solution. Looking at key overlap percentage, for example, works much better. There are a lot of other ways to make dual-use/tap-hold functionality more reliability, but lots of programs actually implement overlap checks. The kaleidoscope keyboard firmware, for example, lets you configure a minimum overlap threshold for a key to start acting as its secondary role (e.g. only have space act as a modifier when it is pressed first and is held for 70% of the time the second key is pressed).
In your case, I'm not sure why you would need to roll over to other keys from escape. My shift key doubles as escape, and I don't use any delay or checks at all since I don't rapidly type escape then other keys. In any case, you could try configuring your capslock key to only act as control if it being held fully overlaps with the next keypress. Not sure about keyd, but kmonad and kanata both support this (I'd highly recommend kanata). That may require changing how you type depending on the modifier, which is why more fine-grained overlap threshold checks can be useful.
I've tried about ten billion different tools on linux and can confirm that kanata is better than everything else mentioned in this thread and a lot more. It's not the right tool for global hotkeys, so it's not going to completely replace something like AHK or wkhd, but it's basically the closest thing to QMK functionality for a laptop or non-programmable keyboard.
I've used both. Mu4e is a lot simpler for email. I plan to eventually switch to Gnus for everything since it handles so much more than just mail (feed reader, hacker news, reddit, twitter, newsgroups, etc.), but mu4e is much easier to set up. Gnus really shines when you need to deal with a higher volume of messages than you will ever read.
Mu4e now uses Gnus' code for viewing emails by default. Mu4e's headers mode will look a lot nicer than Gnus' article mode though.
Gnus is massive and has a huge learning curve. It would be great if you are working with very active mailing lists. If you're dealing with a small amount of email, there won't be much benefit.
Emacs is not multithreaded, but it has supported async/cooperative threads for a very long time (at least since before I started using it almost a decade ago). Modern packages are generally written to not block while doing something like fetching updates. Gnus still blocks. Someone rewrote it to no longer block, but it is a very large change, and GNU Emacs is unlikely to have non-blocking Gnus anytime soon. I just run Gnus with a separate daemon.
