oh, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14207815

Don't worry about it. Some of these things hit at different times, and this place is often a chaos engine for timing.

The song is nice, but I think the story of the song and the sidebar with the story of anoncvs is a pretty cool point in OS history. The idea of an active code control available to the public had to evolve like all the other ideas and the origin is pretty interesting.

/me done. finally.

fixing this one https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10232282

regarding to excessive amount of required permissions, and the fact that contact == phone number, for now i am preferring ChatSecure.

o@puffy$ mg<Ret>M-x theo<Ret><Ret><Ret>...

an attacker might already have stolen his keys (why only one?), because the script checksums do not match :)

Fixed ;)

The title had to be shortened, was:

  Romantic Cryptography, i.e. how to say "I love you" but only if the other person is going to say "me too"

.. and sorry for the direct PDF link.

now i found out that the article was published in the Journal of Craptology:

  http://www.anagram.com/jcrap/Volume_7/

XOF, nice.. but what is the point of expanding SHAKE256 to e.g. 4096 bits, if its security remains 256 bits ?

To derive 4096 bits of pseudorandom data from an input. For example, you could derive 16 256-bit keys from one master secret.

recap: http://keccak.noekeon.org/fips202final.html