Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | matthewkmayer's commentslogin

Try https://senekor.github.io/jj-for-everyone/introduction.html .

A snippet from the intro:

"At the time of writing, most Jujutsu tutorials are targeted at experienced Git users, teaching them how to transfer their existing Git skills over to Jujutsu. This blog post is my attempt to fill the void of beginner learning material for Jujutsu."


That’s very fun. I’ve been wondering what would happen if someone new to programming started with jj directly.


Thank you!


This is wonderful to see and a great outcome from the effort put into Rust and Rusoto.


Yes, there's a lot of types we generate from the botocore service definitions. Any suggestions on reducing the noise in our docs to make usage clearer? I'd love an issue on Github with thoughts. https://github.com/rusoto/rusoto

We also have a crate that's designed to provide higher level abstractions. Rusoto is analogous to botocore and rusoto_helpers (https://github.com/rusoto/rusoto/tree/master/helpers) will be closer to boto3. It's on the back burner as we focus on completing the core functionality.

Async support is still an open question. If requested we can make that happen before 1.0. Feel free to weigh in: https://github.com/rusoto/rusoto/issues/318 .


Docs wise, a big help would be to highlight 'important' structs. When I was first reading the docs, I saw a great big list of structs including ones like SpecificMethodInputAeguments, and completely missed the KinesisClient structure that all the actual methods are implemented on!


I've made https://github.com/rusoto/rusoto/issues/519 for this particular issue, along with a sample way of calling out the important Client struct for each service. Thanks for the idea!


Thanks for the feedback.

We're tracking the missing services: https://github.com/rusoto/rusoto/issues/436 . There's plenty of work to do and we're concentrating on getting them implemented. Sometimes progress is slow since it's a side project, but it's still moving forward.

If we can make the derive statements work as your code snippet shows, I'd be really happy. We'll take a look at how we can improve codegen when new features are available. Some of our codegen is dated, using what was available when it was written.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: