It's a namespace that contains HTML elements. Pretty obvious choice for the name. Presumably there would be "svg:" for SVG.
It seems the author's fatal mistake was not assigning the "html:" URI to the root namespace since everyone here is so caught up on "HUR DUR HTML:HTML THAT'S SO DUMB LOL XML SUCKS".
Actually I just ended the last word with an asterisk (as in to imply I was correcting my parent comment), completely forgot about its use for formatting. Have edited it out now.
Because it's prone to bad coding and makes my browser crash. Even sites made by giants like google and facebook crash because of bad JS code.
Because web experience has become shitty ever since excessive usage of JS. I'm sick of pages that download megabytes of JS libraries just to animate a button hover. Thanks to CSS3, Now we can do all the needed UX/UI stuff without JS. Make the web better by not using JS.
Searching "FX" on Google brings nothing related to Firefox, not a single link, but "FF" brings Firefox download page. Sorry but I'm going to stick with FF.
There are tons of prior art out there to invalidate this stupid patent. Wondering what lawyers at Amazon where thinking when they filed for this patent.
The good thing about computers is that they can simulate the future based on current physical data and make decisions in realtime, so if a cyclist fells off on front of it, computer can detect the diversion as it happens, simulate each possible scenario beforehand, and choose the one that has the best outcome. actually it can perform a lot better than humans. look at this unbeatable rock-paper-scissors robot video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nxjjztQKtY