Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | kalipso's commentslogin

Anyone knows if there is something like that with heavy focus on privacy? basically decentralized offline first, end2end encrypted collaborative note taking/knowledgedb is something iam looking for.


For e2ee you might want to have a look at CryptPad (https://cryptpad.org). You can test it on the free instance https://cryptpad.fr

You'll have plenty of doc types with full end to end encryption, including for your drive.


We plan on getting e2ee as we have the military are interested in using it. From what we investigated there will be some tradeoff feature wise (attribution of edits will be harder for example). Happy to receive some help on that front.


A while back this was posted on HN - https://github.com/docmost/docmost/


No, but the French and German governments just gave you an excellent code base to start from!


a lots of folks i know use gpg, especially in the political context it is widely used. so it is not "dead", maybe you just dont know people that actually care.


I accept this. But I myself stopped caring when the new versions of gpg stopped recognizing the public key that I had been using since 2003. I run my own mail server and a bunch of other servers of different types. So I’m not afraid of a little configuration. But I don’t have the patience to debug whatever malfunction gpg has today. If they want people to use this infrastructure, they have to do better.


wait isnt that just enforcing bad practice? doesnt python have proper debuggers with breakpoints ect? why in hell should i use a lib to print stuff just for debugging? i mean why not having a proper logging lib and pipe some statements to [debug] or whatever i dont get it.


Requirements for logging and debugging are quite different. For logging I probably don't want to print the source expression, I probably want to include a semantic description. For logging it is also intended to live in the code for longer, so I probably want something a touch more readable.

The debugging and logging spaces overlap but there are definitely differences if you really start optimizing for debugging experience. I don't think encouraging bad practices is a problem if the code will be deleted before being submitted.


You are right with some points but i still see it a bit different. I disagree with the statement "I don't think encouraging bad practices is a problem if the code will be deleted before being submitted.". The thing is the deadline just needs to be shifted a bit and suddenly you have to commit code in a hurry. There will always be the chance that you forget delete something. A great example is this one: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/03/buffer-overruns-lice... low level code with debugging printfs nearly made it into the freebsd kernel.

I mean everyone prints something for debugging purpouse from time to time, thats fine. but having a lib extra for that. i dont think thats a good idea. Logging frameworks also enable toggling if source expression is printed or not. So you can only show it if you give a --debug flag to your tool for example.


I would recommend advertising that at https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/

the people there are f'ing addicted to the rocktes emoji and dont care how much to pay to have it appear somewhere


I was actually just thinking that he should probably register the [diamond][hands].kk domain, there's got to be some demand for it given how much it gets spammed over there.



OP sort of deserves this. His little commercial there shows the diamond hands emoji but he never registered it


> The offical site for diamond hands

> Money printer go brrr. fuck them paper hands

Flawless. I couldn't have expected anything more from this site. It perfectly met my expectations.


that was quick


wrong emoji... this is it http://.kz


way ahead of you... OP was right, it was a pain to use that registrar.


Diamond hands appears to be taken everywhere listed by the mainstream emoji registration sites, sadly. It was a good idea


hah


Oh man, can cannot emphasize enough how much i don't care about this.

"The traditional disciplines of engineering—civil, mechanical, aerospace, chemical, electrical, environmental—are civic professions as much as technical ones. Engineers orchestrate the erection of bridges and buildings; they design vehicles and heavy machinery;"

so what? Traditions change, names change, everything changes, software engineers will be called engineers and no one cares if they build bridges or not. I can tell you if i connect a xmpp service to some twitter account i also built a bridge. so software engineers do build bridges! And talking about "tradition" in a digital revolution is also weird, because right now everything is changing and nothing will be like before. This wolrd will never be the same as 1960, so why stick to old naming convetions anyway. This article is nothing but time-wasting, sorry if i offend someone with that but it is my honest opinion.


Places like IBM, and Microsoft would benefit immensely if government certification was required.


Right that's going to work well NOT - you know a lot of climbing he greasy pole is not what you know its who you know.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: