Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ileri62's commentslogin

good. The (car)-sharing industry can't die soon enough


Serious question: Django doesn't even have lazy loading. Why do people use it? Am I missing something? No way I'd wait a few seconds to get something big from the db


What are you referring to?

Lazy loading in Rails tends to refer to how Active Record waits until access time to send the query: https://rubyinrails.com/2014/01/08/what-is-lazy-loading-in-r...

It's still synchronous.


Django has this type of lazy loading as well: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.1/ref/models/querysets/#...


Yes it does, the problem seems to be that no one bothers to learn how the ORM works.


I bet he means western economists aka lobbyists


snitches end up in ditches


Snitches get stitches


Why is shit like this even news? Venture capitalists fund every random dude's and his mother's enterprise


100% agree. The syntax of languages such as php, c++ and rust just look ugly af. The use of $ and :: piss me off the most


Not to mention that germany did absolutely fucking nothing against VW when dieselgate happened. Still waiting to see Winterkorn & friends under the guillotine for scamming the entire world.

What happened instead? Normal engineers got blamed instead of executives. Fucking capitalism and fucking CDU, SPD and FDP. The sole reason for their existence is to sack money from lobbyists.

When you have people like Schäuble, a piece of shit that was convicted for corruption in 1999, who was the minister of finance for the past couple of years in germany, it makes sense that germany does nothing against big corporate.


> Not to mention that germany did absolutely fucking nothing against VW when dieselgate happened.

VW (and Audi etc.) top executives are under criminal investigations. Their houses and offices have been searched multiple times.

> Still waiting to see Winterkorn & friends under the guillotine for scamming the entire world.

Sorry, we don't have capital punishment. And the guillotine is a bit too French for our taste, anyway (also, it was used by the GDR, so not a good role model).


This is not surprising when you have corruption on the highest level and nothing happens about it - Schröder.


And Riester, who received a lot of money from the insurance industry.


While it is true that Germany has legalized and not so legalized corruption in politics, it makes no sense to single out VW. All large companies have "government affairs" departments which sadly provide great return on investment. If only the people had a government affairs department...


>it makes no sense to single out VW.

merely giving an example that fits this thread (automotive).


I don't think you're fully wrong, but you might be missing the massive economic interest we have in VW (and the rest of the pack) surviving.


> When you have people like Schäuble, a piece of shit that was convicted for corruption in 1999

Do you have source on this?


Schäuble is literally the worst.

https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Wolfgang_Sch%C3%A4uble#/CDU_Part...

He failed to do anything about cum-cum/cum-ex. He came up with a tax on fuel for nuclear power plants, that I am convinced was deliberately designed to be in violation of the constitution, leading to a 7 billion tax-revenue loss.

Not to speak of his views law and order and how the wrecked Greece because he doesn't understand economics.


I cannot find any source on his 'conviction'


The greece part was nothing but blackmail anyway. Hundreds of thousands, possibly millions are worse off in greece just because schäuble.

If greece were governed by a right wing party, I'm sure he'd have been most generous. Germany put pressure on them to get rid of the leftists.



And where does it say that he was convicted?


oh right, even though he also lied to court they suspended the procecution. Good old democratic germany


Wasn't that rather the helicopter noise? Either way it was a stupid decision to include audio. Nearly blew my ears off


Then again you are using the North American definition for left and socialist, because the North American liberals are neither of those two.

Edit: to be fair though, I wouldn't consider liberals of any definition to be left or socialist. They might have some left leaning positions on immigration or the environment, but due to their capitalist nature they can not be considered left.


? 'North American Liberals' are definitely 'left' and 'socialist'.

In the most popular, common use of the term 'Liberal' in north America 'socialist' and 'left wing' would be the most common substitutes.


Not really, I mean Bernie Sanders is not a Socialist since he doesn't want to nationalize any industries which is really the sine qua non of socialism. He is a Social Democrat. Actual socialists usually identify as Leftists instead of Liberals.


Social Democrats are definitely Socialists. That's fair game.

And if Bernie were Emperor for a while, he'd nationalize a few industries, surely. I can barely imagine would Trump would do if he could just make up the law as well.


Disagree. Bernie doesn't advocate socializing any industries. Even Medicare for All would leave hospitals and doctors as private employees. He isn't going out there saying we should have nationalized the Big Three car companies instead of giving them a bailout, or trying to nationalize the banks, or anything else. He's a social democrat, he wants a strong public safety net tied with private ownership of capital. That's a perfectly fine political position, but it's not socialism.


There's a huge difference between what one advocates as a position as a politician trying to get/stay elected in a two-party democracy, and what they'd be willing to force through if they were all-powerful.

As an example, do you think that, given the ability to enact whatever legal changes he wanted, Bernie Sanders would nationalize our telecommunications infrastructure? Or our health care system?

I don't have any specific, citable reason to think he would, but I think there's plenty of reason to believe they're things he might want to do.


Social Democrats are essentially socialists, which is why even the Wikipedia entry has it under 'a series on Socialism'.

There's barely a hard line between Democratic Socialism and Social Democrats.


wat? If they are the same, then why do they have different names? Get a grip. Social democrats have nothing to do with socialists.


The definition of liberal in North America is different to the rest of the world. Liberal is not left wing or socialist elsewhere.

And to confuse matters further, I imagine GP is saying 'left wing' and 'socialist' in NA are somewhat diluted compared to the rest of the world.


Yes, I agree, but your bit: " because the North American liberals are neither of those two." I inferred as liberal in the sense of what people are called, whereas I guess you meant to imply classical liberal, which I guess would be 'Libertarian' but even that label doesn't apply well in the US as it's a fairly populist movement.


No company in the world has a lower reputation than O2. It can't get lower


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: