Any idea if you can use the proprietary nvidia driver for better gaming performance while running sway via nouveau? I'm still on i3 on my desktop but sway everywhere I have amdgpu or intel.
With recent nvidia versions, proprietary drivers work decently with Sway if you enable kernel modesetting. There was some jank with fbdev (an optional framebuffer thing with better performance) at some point, not sure if version 550 fixed it.
You definitely can't run nouveau at the same time as the propriety drivers. You can just use the proprietary drivers though. I don't know my exact stack, but I have definitely run CUDA and ROCm software while using Sway.
I've lost either the earbuds or case of so many wireless earbuds during the past 4 years that I could have afforded 2-3 much higher quality wired earbuds.
Pens: lol yes, it’s why I’ve never tried to get into very-nice pens.
I’d have lost my AirPods several times without find my. I’m certain I’d not have managed to keep both buds more than a couple months if I weren’t very diligent about putting them back in the case when I’m not actively using them.
It's way easier for me to lose something the size and weight of a nickel than a phone. Not to mention ear buds do on occasion come lose and fall. With wired headphones, they dangle, but wireless buds fall into all manner of nooks, drains, and bottomless caverns.
This I'm not sure of. I also have a habit to use Takeout quarterly (but this blob is not merged). I think I should check these configs; I want the full fidelity.
Sadly, it’s not configurable. It’s just an inherent limitation of the API (1). Takeout is the best alternative, but for something more realtime you can use tools (2) that wrap the browser UI which also exports full quality.
Running headless chrome and scraping the photos via dev tools sounds like good way to get your account banned by some automation with no human support to help you :/
It's really stupid that the API doesn't support this. For now I'll stick to regular takeout archives. Syncthing directly from the phone might be a better option for regular backups.
I managed to filter that, geeksforgeeks.org and towardsdatascience.com out with Kagi. It's quite helpful being able to slightly reduce prioritization on a per site basis so that instead of showing up as top result it'll be buried a bit but still accessible.
Would absolutely love to buy this and throw OpenBSD on it. Not all proposed hw appears to be supported yet but if this gains traction then that might be enough of a catalyst.
Polars has an OLAP query engine so without any significant pandas overhaul, I highly doubt it will come close to polars in performance for many general case workloads.
Polars can use lazy processing, where it collects all of the operations together and creates a graph of what needs to happen, while pandas executes everything upon calling of the code.
Spark tended to do this and it makes complete sense for distributed setups, but apparently is still faster locally.
Laziness in this context has huge advantages in reducing memory allocation. Many operations can be fused together, so there's less of a need to allocate huge intermediate data structures at every step.
It's been around in R-land for a while with dplyr and its variety of backends (including Arrow, the same as Polars). Pandas is just an incredibly mediocre library in nearly all respects.
Most of their stuff can be set up without needing a Unifi Controller, but for configuring wifi and gathering stats the software is used. They make a device called a Cloud Key that has the controller built in that can then be used to manage the Unifi gear from the cloud. UNMS is used for more Terrestrial wireless ISP stuff but the switches and point to points can be added to UNMS or the Controller.
All their dedicated hardware like APs do but the device in the link (as well as pretty much all their new gateway products - the "Dream" series) have a controller built-in
