Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | hhua_'s commentslogin

One less known fact is that one of the advisors to US army back in WWII is Dr Liang Sicheng https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liang_Sicheng. He is the father of modern Chinese architecture. He recommended that the Americans military authorities spare the ancient Japanese cities of Kyoto and Nara.

He married with another legend Lin Huiyin, whose niece Maya Lin later designed Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington DC. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maya_Lin


The fact this claim has been at the top of this Hacker News thread for hours piqued my interest. So I did some research.

I read the New York Times "Overlooked" obituary for Dr Liang Sicheng but found no reference to this event. [1]. The closest thing I could find was [2] which writes the following (and links to a currently-unavailable article hosted on the government of China mouthpiece China Daily):

> During World War II, as Japan occupied Beijing and most of coastal China, Liang Sicheng was working in Sichuan. According to Luo Zhewen, a former student who frequently assisted Liang Sicheng in his research, Liang heard that the Allied forces were planning on bombing Japan and Japanese-controlled areas in China. Liang began drawing up a map of the major Chinese cities occupied by Japan as well as Japan’s former capitals, Nara and Kyoto to help American military planners avoid destroying important historic sites and buildings. Liang then traveled to Chongqing, the wartime capital of the Republic of China, and passed the maps to the US Army liaison stationed there.

The NYT article suggests Dr. Liang Sicheng was later in life sent to re-education as a counterrevolutionary of Maoist China, but that he has had his reputation revived by the CCP which turn him into a folk hero. I don't doubt that he passed on maps and messages to the US Army in the hope of sparing culturally important sites from bombing, but without further evidence the claim that he was an advisor to the US military that convinced them to spare Kyoto and Nara appears overblown.

I am happy to be convinced if independent historians believe Liang Sicheng had a part to play in the decision, but right now this claim feels like highly-upvoted CCP propaganda.

[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/11/obituaries/overlooked-lin...

[2] https://radiichina.com/did-chinese-architect-liang-sicheng-s...


> I am happy to be convinced if independent historians believe Liang Sicheng had a part to play in the decision, but right now this claim feels like highly-upvoted CCP propaganda.

Even for HN this is ridiculously paranoid.


I'm not saying the users upvoting are shills, just that the claim appears amplified and disseminated through through CCP's official propaganda outlet (China Daily is "owned by the Publicity Department of the Communist Party of China")


> I'm not saying the users upvoting are shills

Ah okay, sorry, I thought that's what you meant.


You have to be very naive to think that there are corners on the internet with more than a thousand users that do not have the presence of every superpower. What do you think they’re spending their resources on?


I think official release is more interesting. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/data-analytics/introd...


Great work! Love to see more datasets coming!


Checkout The advanced open dataset by https://BitBank.nz and tutorial for building a trading algorithm based on the open BigQuery data http://blog.bitbank.nz/backtesting-cryptocurrency-trading-wi...



Followed


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: