Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | gbookman's commentslogin

Seems like Steam/Valve games would be an awesome addition to an Apple-branded television.


Seems like they've had this idea for a while, between their previous PS3 integration and their take on supporting televisions via Steamworks:

http://www.steampowered.com/steamworks/thebigpicture.php


I was thinking the same thing.

The real interesting part is that the AppleTV would surely be an ARM platform and Valve are exclusively an Intel platform. Given the price point it could easily be both.

I agree that being compatible with whatever hardware Valve is making would be pretty awesome.


"AppleTV would surely be an ARM platform"

Battery life isn't an issue in the home and ARM can't really do full fledged ports of the most demanding and popular AAA console titles. So I'd expect an Intel chip. It could possibly have an ARM chip too but I'd guess emulation is good enough and higher profit. Alternatively they could put in a bunch of ARM chips but iOS just makes a lot more sense on paper. With an Intel chip you gain the whole iOS library and the whole OS X library. At that point the library and capabilities may be good enough to forego other console purchases for many consumers.


Not sure if you're insinuating that they would have to emulate arm to run iOS. There is absolutely no reason it couldn't run iOS on intel chips. The iOS simulator in Xcode is exactly that. Devs would have to re-compile their apps, but I assume the screen size would be different enough they would have to do that already.


Noise is a problem. I'm not sure whether Apple wants to compromise on that.


The hypothetical Apple TV also has a very generous footprint, which gives Apple a lot of playing room for thermal management.

Not to mention, the current Mac Minis run dead silent with fairly speedy x86 chips.


Blisterin' barnacles! I was introduced to Tintin with the animated series on Nickelodeon. Probably watched too much TV when I was a lad


The regular MacBook is also unibody now and seems to be pretty close to the MBP in terms of build quality.


Yeah, the white unibody has a very nice build to it; it doesn't seem like it will crack. But only time will tell.


They must've planned this as a way to placate pissed off app developers.


They don't give a crap about the developers or what the developers think about them.


Then why would they invest millions, if not billions, in creating, enhancing, and supporting developer tools?

Obviously they only do so to benefit themselves, but it's quite clear from their actions that Apple does care about developers.


Put it this way: they don't care about what the developers have to say about their platform or their policies and they assume that whatever minority of developers has left their platform will be replaced by an army of new ones. I mean, how many people have actually dropped their development for the iPhone/iPad? Have you noticed it?


out of my friends (who develop for the iPhone)? One or two.

Most are still staying onboard (maybe... 25 or so).

Don't forget this is the internet; like most things the disgruntled developers will be the most vocal. That doesn't necessarily make them a majority - or even a large minority.


They should, or else they'll lose developers to a platform run by a company that does.


Hopefully...


You have to wonder how much of this is PR damage control considering how the developer community pretty much called out their BS.


I also prefer In-N-Out to Five Guys, although they do have superior fries and you gotta love being able to munch on peanuts while you stand in line.

In-N-Out's deducation to quality and top-notch customer service is actually quite similar to Five Guys. The reason they're only in the Southwestern US is to ensure that each restaurant is close to a food distribution center. That way all their food is made with the freshest ingredients. They've been family-owned and operated since the 50's.


He also made a similar statement with the release of iTunes 1.0 back in '01, as Apple took far longer to embrace digital music than other companies.


Yes.

The interface looks so intuitive and just plain fun. Plus the battery life and 1.5 lb weight is fantastic. I can see myself spending the vast majority of my non-coding time on the iPad.

Being able to use my bluetooth keyboard with it is also a big plus.


This service just makes so much sense for both readers and the media outlets. Now every game in every sport can be summarized, plus it frees up time and resources that can be invested in expert analysis and other enhancements to the user experience.

The only thing I'd like to see is the ability to incorporate commentary from fans. ESPN and others already do live chats on various games and it seems like you could extrapolate meaningful events from that data if you had access to it.


I think you guys are doing the right thing by not worrying about EULAs and other protection mechanisms at this stage in the game. Stay focused on satisfying your customers and improving the product as much as possible until you start making major headway.


Free article: http://techcrunch.com/2010/03/18/google-tv-apple-tv/

To be honest, I'm surprised it's taken Google so long to do this. The potential benefits for Google are even greater than Apple's because Google is working hard to become a dominant player in TV advertising.

Late or not, this is very good news for consumers because hopefully it will lead to iPhone/Android apps being accessible on your TV. The possibilities for gaming would definitely make me worried if I were Nintendo, Microsoft or Sony.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: