Bandwidth is problematic for mesh. A remote assistance situation would involve at least 4 high definition camera streams, and ideally with minimal latency. It's challenging to put that much data onto public spectrum even if you wanted to make a custom radio.
I was thinking more for communicating the “mass disruption in progress” message - or even just distributing the manually verified “traffic lights down” data between vehicles.
> When you run Get-Mailbox -Identity <MailboxIdentity> | Format-List AuditEnabled, the AuditEnabled property always displays as True. This hardcoded display value doesn't reflect the actual mailbox-level audit configuration.
> To verify the actual mailbox audit status, use the Filter parameter in the following command:
PowerShell
> If the command returns the mailbox object, mailbox-level auditing is enabled. If the command returns an error stating the object couldn't be found, mailbox-level auditing is disabled.
It's interesting they ever exposed it at all really! I don't think you can use Google's Spanner-based etcd replacement for a self-managed Kubernetes cluster, for example.
Easier said than done in this case. Actually effective crosschecks preventing this issue from occurring would entail rather massive I/O and CPU amplification in common operations.
we could have run with https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/app-pgchecksums.html turned on, but it slows things down a bunch - and turning it on in retrospect would have taken days. Also not clear that it would have caught whatever the underlying corruption was here…
Suprised no one has mentioned RFC 8914 Extended DNS Errors, specifically section 4.17[1]:
> 4.17. Extended DNS Error Code 16 - Censored
> The server is unable to respond to the request because the domain is on a blocklist due to an external requirement imposed by an entity other than the operator of the server resolving or forwarding the query. Note that how the imposed policy is applied is irrelevant (in-band DNS filtering, court order, etc.).
Which would be relevant for Google DNS's "Query refused" at least. Although I guess it's possible maybe they do support it but Windows/Chromium don't...
Binary compatibility is necessarily at odds with the “recompile the world” philosophy. This global view has some advantages, eg. performance can be improved system wide LTO, calling conventions changes, security with hardening options, etc.
The local view, where a program with no knowledge of its runtime environment could appear at any time to a runtime environment that similarly knows nothing about a program, loses all those advantages and costs added constraints but gains.. the ability to run those programs.
The article argues that the balance should be shifted, to their (eventual) benefit, sure. I wonder how long until that would take.
I wonder if there’s more “pay for play” path. I guess that’s containers. Or maybe what they argue for but bundled software could stay the way it is now. Further bifurcation seems bad, adding more code paths to test etc.
Presumably there's some reason Go can't just use an embedded manifest[1] like everyone else?
Ahh, I'm inferring (from [2]) even with the manifest entry, a system wide registry key is also required to get long paths working:
> I'm working with the Windows security team to find a way to enable long path support without having to modify the registry, just by using the embedded manifest, but the chances of this happening soon are quite low.
