Fair question. Most of the open-source tools I’ve seen focus on generating a single commit message from a diff. Zyg does that too, but the main idea is different: it treats your commits as raw material for project updates.
Instead of just producing “better commit messages,” it can take a series of commits on a branch and turn them into a narrative of progress - the kind of thing you’d actually paste in Slack, send to a PM, or have emailed to stakeholders automatically.
Thanks! compared to the other players in this space $50 is actually on the lower end. But you're right that $50 isn't pocket change. In the spirit of full transparency - We're still figuring out our pricing - if you're interested in trying out LimeJourney and pricing is a blocker, shoot me an email at tobi@limejourney.com and we can work something out.
Don't know much about this but it seems they say they are a Customer Data Platform (managing customers, leads and visitors data) - LimeJourney is a customer engagement platform allowing business engage with their customers, we essentially combine data from various touchpoints including CDPs to create more effective marketing strategies.
Thank you very much for your reply and explanation.
That's good to know. Sounds like LimeJourney and Unomi could play well together then. It's not a space I know much about so I appreciate your explanation. I've just been bookmarking useful looking services in anticipation of needing so scale up a future business.
Hey, great question. I'm familiar with Laudspeaker, Not so much with Mautic & in all honesty I don't think there are any fundamental diffs between LJ(limeJourney) & the options on the market. Yeah, we have some AI stuff in the mix but ultimately I did not set out to build out something different instead I wanted to provide an alternative, less commercial solution for smaller use cases or customer engagement.
atp - all the features are available and can be self hosted & I think it is going to be that way for a long time - This is a side project and so I'm not really pressed to make money from it instead I am excited about seeing the community get some sort of value from it. If for some reason we need to further commercialise the project all features that wouldn't be self hosted will live in the enterprise directory and will be developed by an in-house team not the open source community.
Instead of just producing “better commit messages,” it can take a series of commits on a branch and turn them into a narrative of progress - the kind of thing you’d actually paste in Slack, send to a PM, or have emailed to stakeholders automatically.