I don't know what the difference is intended to be but the guidelines also don't have anything to say about voting on comments except not to complain about it.
There are 4 different categories of fixing the global CO2 challenge:
a. Remove CO2 from atmosphere
b. Prevent adding new CO2 from reaching atmosphere
This could also be a good use case for #b where CO2 is captured before being released to the atmosphere. For example factories and vehicles could be mandated to use this.
While your link is helpful, he did not say that. He specifically mentions changing the admissions standards. Specifically having different standards for different social classes.
I have second handedly seen the effects of such discrimination in other societies and it really is crippling to the economy. Be wary of any kind of discrimination specifically one that lowers expected grades.
> Now they have lower standards for applicants from poor families or bad schools. As a result Oxford and Cambridge have sunk to fourth place in the latest Times Good Universities Guide.
Your link bolsters the point of the person you are responding to. The lowering of standards is the relevant portion. It would be relevant if they lowered standards for any group, just happened they lowered them for poor families.
Found this amazing hackathon project by X @blendrskool. There is a 3D skeuomorphic radio on the screen with dials, knobs, buttons all usable from the web portal. Github link: https://github.com/blenderskool/radiai
This is really cool! I am building a p2p social games platform and this will be super useful as a base. Would love to connect if you are interested in seeing a prototype.
Spoke with someone on the Yellowstone team a few weeks ago. They mentioned most wolves lose life to ranchers. Avg wolf life in Yellowstone is just 3 years!
reply