what are the main benefits of doing so?
I'm missing what's the deal with jailbreak in this case, using thee transfer via USB? what's the best thing i can do afterwards?
I use Koreader on my Kobo ereader for a few reasons:
- Much much faster than stock interface
- More customisable
- Comes with an ssh server. I load a static rsync binary and use rsync for syncing the library
- Much better for reading manga. Supports cbz, cbr format natively. Has the ability to clip empty space around the content to make reading on a small screen easier.
looking forward to moving away from YNAB. it became too expensive for what it offers (note: i can't use auto-sync) .
On the other side, i've 3+ years of data and various script to overcome problems such us import from csv, auto-split categories etc. Thus, if someone find an easy-to-use alternative that has budget and bookkeeping that would be great.
I think EOS is great and that every startup should use it, but have a feeling that most HN readers will detest it because of Not Invented Here syndrome. It’s too tempting to think “How hard can it be to figure out how to run a meeting, set goals, etc.?” And then end up spending the time that should’ve been spent having meetings and working towards goals on all the minutiae and cruft that somebody else has worked out in the past.
homomorphic encryption should solve the problem of field encryption. But not now.
Note: the choice of the different solutions should be aligned with the sensitivity of the data, such as: Field Encryption for Highly sensitive (among others, bank data, health data etc), while the DB is, off course, only encrypted at rest.
Homomorphic is literally hundreds of thousands of times slower than operations on plaintext. A comparison of 2 64-bit integers can take around > 50ms. So even with a b-tree where maybe ~100 comparisons could occur, the query will take 5s. A linear scan over 1m records would take 13 hours!
that's a point that many (too many) people misses right now. it will cause a lot of problem. If someone is able to reproduce (somehow) what AWS / Google does fro cloud, but with an EU company, they will have a lot of new customers very soon.
It's a common confusion, but when you contract with Google Cloud, the service is provided by "Google Cloud EMEA Limited, Ireland", which is an European company, and when they provide you with a datacenter in Europe they are totally an European company operating in Europe.
This is different for example to DigitalOcean LLC, that is a US-entity providing service to European customers (this example has to be verified, but that's what I remember).
Google Cloud EMEA Limited, Ireland is subsidiary of US entity. It could just as well could be a US company with respect to privacy laws and regulations.
