There is proof that AI isn't what they all make it to be, in the acquisitions of these companies. Why would Anthropic need Bun or OpenAI need windsurf for billions, if agents are all knowing and ready to replace devs?
This is a modern marketing, based on FUD and sensationalism
I'm mostly writing about dev nowadays, and random tech stuff I've been doing, but I have a bunch of management posts from when I forayed on the dark side.
The worst bit was that the touch-sensitive area didn't extend as far left as the physical keyboard - so not only did the ESC key become virtual with no tactile feedback, it also shifted position.
Until someone stops installing gmail because it's too big (and it's coming back as a signal), I doubt anything will be done about it. In the absence of constraints, things just keep growing... without constraints. The costs of pruning/shaking embedded frameworks, refactoring, optimization, etc. cannot be justified if it's not signaled as a problem by customers.
There is proof that AI isn't what they all make it to be, in the acquisitions of these companies. Why would Anthropic need Bun or OpenAI need windsurf for billions, if agents are all knowing and ready to replace devs?
This is a modern marketing, based on FUD and sensationalism
reply