Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bleuarff's commentslogin


Which is itself intuitive if you have the prior that “making the claim is the stronger headline, so if the claim is true, it’ll be in the headline”


Because it's never been considered an interesting target, compared to npm's reach?


For a while CPAN was a very big deal and those packages were probably on just about every corporate network on Earth.


Interesting. Any source on why/when the switch happened?


There’s a claim that it was a marketing scheme in the 1940s to reduce the usefulness of hand-me-downs in families. My grandmother would have lived through that and I may see if she remembers anything about it. She was definitely babysitting or watching children by 1940.


That doesn't make sense to me US textiles were in high demand, though perhaps not in pink and blue starting around 1940 and by the end of the decade US consumers were getting quite wealthy. I'm not saying it didn't happen but I'd like to see a better reason than "companies love money" since if you loved money in the 1940s there were better ways to get it than trying to do some sort of marketing campaign to reverse a social standard (using a marketing industry that was much less advanced and pervasive no less.)


It seems your argument applies to fashion in general. But fashion is a well known phenomenon. How then can your argument be valid?


Handling resize is a different beast than being responsive. Working for every viewport dimension under the sun is not the same thing as gracefully handling an animation while the viewport size changes - the latter is much more challenging.


I agree, I was not even expecting it to handle the resize well. I just thought the landing page wanted me to resize my window to test responsiveness (before I noticed that the animation itself changes the content area size).

That being said, when resizing a window, the scrollbar should not reset/jump to top. At the very least, it should revert to what it was when going back to full size.


Yes it is, but it's my understanding that this is the actual testimony from Tulsi Gabbard, part of the conversation.


Here in France, we have strict laws, and on-calls MUST be paid in some form or another. When we were bought by a US company, mgmt tried to set up on-call shifts for us - we had never needed them for the 10 years prior -, until they learnt of labor laws and went "fuck it, you're on call mon-fri, 10am - 6pm". I'm forty, have a family, and no amount of money could justify that I can't shutoff my phone at night, or prevent from going on a walk on weekends because "uptime". I've never been so glad of french worker protections.


I, for one, thought of a similar concept from Zelda Tears of the Kingdom.


I thought so, but when I came back to the tab later it was working, and was able to go through all examples. Unlike Chrome who crashed halfway through the page.


Yes, but the model has asked that the community stops using this image. It should be pretty easy to find an image that can serve as a standard, and that no one objects to.


This is the thing that makes it pretty open and shut to me. Image library devs can still choose to put the whole political thing aside to respect the wishes of the photo's subject.

Does anyone have to, well, not really, but it'd be the nice thing to do.


Any sources on this?


Yes, for example the interview with her in this video: https://youtu.be/yCdwm2vo09I


To be fair, the article using this image is from 2021 - before the linked interview was even recorded.


Fair enough, thanks for pointing it out.


Not sure that was the case 50ky ago. That was during a glacial period, sea level was probably 100+m below current level.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: