someone might build enough hype around it to challenge the oligopoly.

As for training on existing browsers: they are trained on the whole corpus of the human thought process and can take many insights from other fields into the browser, they can write a browser in a completely new language without just transpiring but building it from first principles or as karparthy calls it spec based programming.

I am curious. What do you want us to see in that github repo?

this is the whole message of this hype that you can churn out 500 commits a day relatively confidently the way you have clang churn out 500 assemblies without reading them. We might not be 100% there but the hype is looking slightly into the future and even though I don't see the difference to Claude code, I tend to agree that this is the new way to do things even if something breaks on average it's safe enough

Your username says a lot about your whole message

what still doesn't click for me is what can it do that Claude can't do

these verbs seem appropriate when you accept neutral (MLP) activation as excitement and DL/RL as decision processes (MDPs...)

except when it needs to do tasks then it's the slowest of them all

there was nothing nano about that language at all if you want true nano drop return keywoards or just go APL

it's not going to help them. For Siri to be really useful it wouldn't need deep system integration and an external model is not going to provide that. People don't believe me when I said it about Apple Intelligence with open AI

claude

Claude operate this patient Claude build my kitchen Claude produce a billion mobile phones

snapshots are local Time Machine backups for a few hours which don't need external hard drives and are configured by default I think