I agree with author's points. I think we need to take one more step, to examine this harmness issue. Social media are harmful, but why do we care about them more than about idk radio? Well, because social media is much more widespread. And why it is widespread? Because of the advertising. And incidentally the whole other host of harmful things is so impactful because of the ads - drugs, gambling, garbage foods, etc.
To combat Tiktok or smoking or gambling yourself into bankruptcy we don't need to ban each of these individually (and fail to do so in the process). We need to ban advertising of them.
To be frank, no one had a crystal ball back then, and stuff could go either way with uncertainty in both hardware and software capabilities. Sure Lidars were better even back then, but the bet was on catching up on them.
I hate Elon's personality and political activity as much as anyone, but it is clear from technical PoV that he did logical things. Actually, the fact that he was mistaken and still managed to not bankrupt Tesla is saying something about his skills.
The corporate hypocrisy is reaching previously unseen levels. Ultra-wealthy thieves who got rich upon stealing a dragon horde worth of property are now crying foul about people following the same "ideals". What an absolute snowflakes. LLM sector is the only one where I'm rooting for Chinese corporations trouncing the incumbents, thus demonstrating FAFO principle in practice.
This article misses one important point. Maybe even the most important. WebAssembly didn't get traction because of theft. Making a game or professional software in it essentially equals to publishing full source and assets online, ripe for taking by any unscrupulous party. SAAS may endure that, but games will not. And that's why we can't have nice things.
> Making a game or professional software in it essentially equals to publishing full source and assets online, ripe for taking by any unscrupulous party.
How is this true? seems to me that webassembly looks kind of equivalent to the output you'd get from an x86 disassembler for an x86 native program -- sure it's editable, but it's certainly not equivalent to the original source used to produce it.
To put it another way -- Webassembly encourages theft exactly as much as any other kind of DRM-free publishing; and you can add anti-piracy measures to it in the same way you can with other software.
Neither is democratic. Democratic is direct rule of citizens, or at least some significant fraction of citizens. Only Switzerland is partially a democracy nowadays. Western countries are oligarchies, where elected elites are ruling however they deem necessary, but possibly with some caution because of elections. China is not even an oligarchy, it's a despotic regime, completely severed from the citizens.
There are 9400 active Starlink satellites & they can be launched 28 at a time on a partially reusable rocket. The orbit they operate on is largely self cleaning due to being quite low. The satellites operate in many planes and bands + form a mesh network with laster interconnects.
Sure, if you want to try that and bankrupt Iran even more via its militarry rocket program, you can do that and maybe destray a handfull satellites, provided you can actually hit them and the rocket/s does not fail. And you might even get a nice casus belli as a free extra.
I'm not a rocket scientist, but I guess even a single lunch in the retrograde direction should be enough. You lunch a box of ball bearings with a plastic explosive to spread them out, and then just wait. The cloud will pass over Iran every 12h or and will stay in orbit for quite a few weeks, since the orbit is even higher than ISS reboosting once a month, and balls are highly aerodynamic compared to the Starlink flat sails. The cloud won't be very big, but it will repeatedly swipe through quite a lot intersecting prograde orbits. I guess the chance would be quite high. Iran can also split payload into smaller boxes and "deploy" then in sequence while the second stage is firing, then detonate them, to spread out even more.
It looks almost like a PE hit. A company worth less than an offer takes on a ton a of debt to buy a competitor, then Ellisons will plunder and restructure new company multiple times, until one part has all the nice parts and another has all the debt, and then through some clever legal hacks and corruption will cut off that debt an bankrupting it.
Yep, it's like getting a commoner from the street evaluate a literature PhD in their native language. Sure, both know the language, but the depth difference of a specialist vs a generalist is too large. And neither we can't use AI to automatically evaluate this literature genius because real AI doesn't exist (yet), hence the programs can't understand the contents of text they output or input. Whoops. :)
Thankfully Firefox helped me with tab hoarding dependency, by silently losing saves session without any visible crash or issue, just on the normal open. Now I have to treat tabs as if they won't be saved ever again and don't leave anything important open. Thanks Mozilla, great use of your time and money, spending them on useless LLM integration and lining CEOs pockets instead of fixing damn basic functionality.
So much this. Thankfully it hasn't lost tabs for me for a very long time, but I find it ridiculous that Firefox's session persistence is basically "yeah let's deserialize it into a single line of JSON and write it to disk every 15 seconds".
On top of that, what was their solution when it became apparent it was slowly killing your SSD by blowing up write amplification through the roof [1]? Zipping the JSON. Yeah. Seriously.
I mean sure, this storage format might've been a nice first implementation as a PoC, but you'd think they'd redo this at some point and store the session in an Sqlite DB file or something, I mean it's not like they haven't been using it already for history and bookmarks.
As a tech support for a person with iOS gadgets, this is exactly some tasks which are way too hard on iPad. Emails getting lost because default Mail app was flaky, so I need to install Gmail app. Travel involves tickets, aka files. Now I need to help find the files in the locked down hell of a UI and figure out how to send them to a different app. Bonus points if they were archived and need unpacking. Messaging - some accounts tied to an old number, and a new number is needed to, well, make calls, and Apple generously doesn't provide dualsim option outside of China, so now I need to figure out sync between two devices with two sims, and then some messengers don't allow that while others do, and then I need to explain all that to an elderly non-IT person... In short - it's a mess, every time any task outside of doomscrolling an watching YT arises on iOS.
To combat Tiktok or smoking or gambling yourself into bankruptcy we don't need to ban each of these individually (and fail to do so in the process). We need to ban advertising of them.
reply