Sadly the UK has a long history of sending its own tech industry abroad...
It begun with the invention of the computer as we know it...
- Charles Babbage,"Father of the computer", British
- Alan Turing, "Father of modern computer science", British
Then there was Margret Thatcher who decided the internet was a fad and wasn't worth investing in internet infrastructure in the country.
Where did the multi billion (if not trillion by now) industry end up? Silicon Valley and elsewhere....
Thatcher was replaced by a guy called Blair who saw the internet as the future worth investing in. Sadly he found another cause to throw money at.
The mistake Thatcher made was to open up the telecoms market to competition at a time when the legacy provider (BT) were starting to build a high speed internet highway/backbone. In hindsight, this could indeed be considered an error but looking how BT have fared since, perhaps not?
We're now in the absurd situation where 4 out of 6 power generating companies are foreign owned and the Japanese own our chip manufacturer.
All because of her policies that originally envisioned that the share holding would be by the British public, not foreigners.
And the latest scandal is that our water companies are dumping ridiculous amounts of sewage into our waterways while giving out huge dividends. And there's nothing anyone seems to be able to do about it.
We've had a few Prime Ministers since Thatcher, was her reach so powerful that she could prevent them from doing anything about this?
I recall Blair saying he regretted not doing enough about energy security when he was in power, I don't recall him blaming Thatcher?
Brown expands nuclear ambitions (2008):
The prime minister said that with oil prices soaring, it was time to be "more ambitious" for nuclear plans...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7424158.stm
There has been a long history of failure, by both sides of the political spectrum.
Well, yes. Thatcher had a long tenure, a strong majority and enacted sweeping, long-lasting changes.
Blair was the only other recent politician with similar power. He was actually a fan of privatisation and deregulation (and still is, if you read recent interviews).
And recent governments don't even want to fix it, the status quo benefits their rich donors, even if it's massively hurting Britain's long-term prosperity. You've also got a significant section of the Tory party that still believe in the thoroughly discredited neoliberalism Thatcher followed, as seen by Liz Truss' disastrous tenure.
I'm not a Thatcher hater, but there were a lot of negatives as well as positives.
All because of her policies that originally envisioned that the share holding would be by the British public, not foreigners.
This is the most charitable interpretation of events (no sarcasm intended[1]), and one I would like to believe, but greed is very powerful and leads people to evil, so I can well imagine various lobbying groups would have seen the easy mid-term money to be made from such sales.
[1] "Never attribute to malice that which may be adequately be explained by incompetence."
True but the driver before the world wide web would have been cable TV over fibre to the home.
She decided it was better to open the market to foreign cable TV providers and so barred BT from selling TV access.
Without TV there was no driver for fibre investment.
Where BT would have had a requirement to provide universal access to fibre, as with phone provision, Telewest and NTL just did geograhically limited roll outs of legacy coax and the rest is history.
Fair enough, but I don’t see how this supports her thinking the internet was a fad not worth investing in.
Also it denies agency to those in power in the decades that followed. I mean did that decision bind the policymakers that followed when it became clear how important the internet really was?
Well you can't make all the right moves in history :) At least they got mercantilism right and built an effective navy to practically rule the world not so long ago.
Success to you is for you to define. Don't fall into the trap of VC funding because its all you read on HN or Techcrunch. What you have built is your baby so don't let anyone else tell you what you should be doing. It sounds like you have so much meaning and purpose in the company you have. If (and it sounds like) you don't want the vc money, then that is the right decision for you.
Initially hesitated to switch to 1Password since some of our team used Linux but eventually we all switched to Mac so that went away.
Much happier with 1Password since we switched from Lastpass. Consistent UI, proper OS integration, multiple separate vaults, not to mention the security story seems better (I've seen several LP vulnerabilities of concern but not yet seen a 1PW one that worried me).
1password's Windows version does run under Wine, including the browser extension. It's been a while since I did it, but I think there was some sort of browser extension validation feature that had to be disabled. Not 100% up to the security standards of their other platforms, but it's functional.
I used it (1P) and it was super, but mac only - no Linux client. Just switched over to Enpass, and its very like 1Password, only they do provide a linux client. So far its great, very happy with it.
I was really surprised that I was able to get 1Password for Windows working under Wine, even 1P Mini works with the browser extensions. It's not terribly reliable, though.
I've used 1Password on Mac / iPhone / iPad for years and it's one of my few must have apps. It's been great, other than a few annoyances with mobile app and upgrade pricing (sorted now, in a logical way). Syncing has always been solid and I've never had any corruption issues.
I've been tempted to do away with the extra clicks and just use iCloud Keychain and encrypted Notes, but 1Password feels like less of a black box at this point (maybe just because I've been using it longer). It also seems smarter about filling out forms than the browser-native options in Chrome and Safari — not perfect, but better. I don't use their subscription service, just the desktop and mobile app.
I'm a long time lastpass user, it does enough for me.
Different strong password for every website I use except but never store email, banking or hosting accounts.
On another note the cheapest premium 1password is three times the cost of premium lastpass.
Thinking about it I'm really only using it for convenience, security/strong passwords is in second place.
Can you be more detailed about "shit android support"? I'm currently trying it out and didn't seem so bad, similar to how I currently use LastPass in Android in general. Apparently I need an extra click to actually copy a password there, but I also saw they have an integrated keyboard (https://support.1password.com/android-keyboard/), which I haven't looked at yet.
> Given all the problems with OpenSSL, I really wished they used something like BoringSSL.
For basic crypto algorithms, there's little to no difference. Most of the changes in BoringSSL are in higher-level code, like TLS and certificate management.
Wrong metric to use. Just because nobody talks about it doesn't mean it's a "good" choice. It might be better for all you or I know, but using how many hacker news posts you see for something like this is not a good way to evaluate a product.
Thanks for this. I just discovered http://hckrnews.com for the first time through your list of links. I think I'll be using it to browse the site from now on!
Right here is a pdf on why you should consider owning an asset such as Bitcoin. I'm not saying everyone should go all in, just consider owning it as part of your investment portfolio...
This situation strangely reminds me of MSN Messenger for anyone old enough to remember that. It ended in failure. Most blamed Microsoft's management for it.
Huge respect to Tim Cook for standing up for the personal information security of Apples users around the world. When a non tech demands something as stupid as a back door, they do not acknowledge how weak they make data security.
Just reading that headline makes me think to myself. Why ask Goldman Sachs? They are clearly ahead of the capitalism game so of course they are gonna say it works well!?!?
Asking the richest capitalists in the world if capitalism works is a silly question if you ask me...
> My wife was out of town so to “celebrate” I treated myself to In-n-Out for lunch!
I love your frugal approach. You deserve everything you got. Nice to see how professionally you both handled the negotiations and it certainly teaches me the virtue of patience!
It begun with the invention of the computer as we know it... - Charles Babbage,"Father of the computer", British - Alan Turing, "Father of modern computer science", British
Then there was Margret Thatcher who decided the internet was a fad and wasn't worth investing in internet infrastructure in the country.
Where did the multi billion (if not trillion by now) industry end up? Silicon Valley and elsewhere....
Bravo UK... Bravo </sarcasm>