Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Keyframe's commentslogin

That's a problem for Super Saiyan AGI to solve :)

He even outlived Ligtwave!

Since they're going to get them anyways, maybe we should exchange a few for a few pandas with the right to reproduce.

has anyone actually commented to you in a negative way about using Let's Encrypt? I couldn't imagine, but curious on others' experiences.

One thing I heard recently which might be a valid point - that LE is based in US, which makes it a subject to US laws. Read from that what you will though.


No matter where they were based they would be subject to US laws since they offer services to US peoples. (similar to how everyone here always points out that US companies are subject to EU laws if they offer services in the EU).

Why is that problematic? They don't have your private keys and their "level of access" is equivalent to any other certificate authority that your browser trusts.

> Why is that problematic? They don't have your private keys and their "level of access" is equivalent to any other certificate authority that your browser trusts.

Let's Encrypt could stop issuing certificates to you, if the administration decided that necessary. This would at least disrupt whatever you were serving. Not that I think this is likely, only possible.

I think LE clealy demonstrated the need for a accessible free ACME authority. But it is high time for more alternatives (EU and China at least). FWIW: Everything around public infrastructure should be run decentralized not-for-profit using national resources. Things like DNS Registrars are silly if you think about it. They just buy it from TLD holders anyway.


I used mathematica for real last time in SGI days and loved it. I know probably a ton has changed since, but I do have to ask those that use it today if you'd still use it for non math-heavy (and even so) tasks if you have access to the wonderful world of python and jupyter / polars, R, and similar?

Mathematica is awesome for weird, one-off tasks in fields that I'm unfamiliar with, since the documentation is excellent, and the functionality is really broad (so I don't need to figure out how to install a specialty program for every one-off task). But for fields that I'm experienced with or tasks that I'm planning on running frequently, I'll usually just use Python, since most of the Python libraries have more functionality and run quicker than Mathematica.

(Mathematica is of course much better than Python at symbolic math, but this isn't what you are asking about)


Just after Pascal vs C craze in mid to late 90's for sure. That is quite a different C++ than the one of today however.

Yeah, behind datasette it looks like there's C64 C parked, and above is a laser 300 (which makes sense if guy is australian) and we can also see 1541-ii behind that, on the top.

Right, laser 300 was called the VZ300 here. I'm out of desk space so I had to put the VZ300 on a stand above my C64C. Maybe AI can finally help me code some C64 and VZ games. :-)

If only! It's kind of a blessing and a curse for us who still code for c64 (demo scene). It looks like llm may help you, but it's usually gibberish 6502 asm. I've seen similar with z80 but on spectrum.

I think generating assembly with an LLM would be like copying from a magazine back then: nothing learned.

But I wonder, do LLMs help explain chunks of 6502 assembly code, in your experience? Say, if one was learning.


yeah that certainly does happen. Especially if you give it the context of the machine since 6502 itself and opcodes do you no good unless you know the memory layout/ map which is in a sense what machine you're on. NES and C64 are 6502, heck even SNES is but 6502 opcodes are nothing since action is in memory you're interacting with.

When you provide context and the memory map, it does help explaining what algos you're looking at and what's going on. I've had a bit more luck with gemini rather than claude on this vs in general claude codes better. ChatGPT is for the most part lost in hallucinations.


don't be discouraged. 4k/UHD BR is still alive and well, even though it never can beat price of comparatively worse streaming versions. I just bought a relatively expensive UHD player and there are a lot of movies, and what I've noticed there are also boutique offerings and remasters going on in the market which I haven't noticed before. Going forward though, I'm not sure if there will be future for releases of new movies outside of big productions.

that's 100% yield which ain't happening

Not with that attitude.

My man.

A man can dream of no waste!

What would you expect yield to be?

With no prior experience? 0%. Those machines are not just like printers :-)

Especially when the plan is to just run them in a random rented commercial warehouse.

I drive by a large fab most days of the week. A few breweries I like are down the street from a few small boutique fabs. I got to play with some experimental fab equipment in college. These aren't just some quickly thrown together spaces in any random warehouse.

And it's also ignoring the water manufacturing process, and having the right supply chain to receive and handle these ultra clean discs without introducing lots of gunk into your space.


Yeah good point, the clean room aspect of it is vital - when you're fabricating at the nano scale, a single speck of dust is a giant boulder ruining your lithography.

We'll have to gain some experience then :)

Sure - once you have dozens of engineers and 5 years under your belt you'll be good to go!

This will get you started: https://youtu.be/B2482h_TNwg

Keep in mind that every wafer makes multiple trips around the fab, and on each trip it visits multiple machines. Broadly, one trip lays down one layer, and you may need 80-100 layers (although I guess DRAM will be fewer). Each layer must be aligned to nanometer precision with previous layers, otherwise the wafer is junk.

Then as others have said, once you finish the wafer, you still need to slice it, test the dies, and then package them.

Plus all the other stuff....

You'll need billions in investment, not millions - good luck!


Thank you. This is going to be way harder than I thought.

Sounds like the kind of question ChatGPT would be good at answering...

it's just a bunch of melted sand. How hard can it be?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: