Because it’s not an attack but rather a voluntary infrastructure choice by a company. We don’t say that Varnish is a MITM because it’s in front of my application, because it’s intentional and under my control. Misusing the term muddies the topic rather than adding clarity, and while there’s a very useful discussion about centralization or why Cloudflare’s most stringent customers might want to deploy their Keyless SSL service that discussion won’t happen if someone misuses the term.
If her job is so worthless, why not go without and accept the (by definition) small diminishing utility.
This is false, having a clean house, clean dishes, cooked food is extremely valuable, but this is mot captured by money, because half of the population were basically indentured servants that were culturally expected to provide this work for free.
It wasn't for free. It was their work. Which, on average and until very recently, was much, much safer, and easier to do than the work of the other half of the population that had to leave the house and seek work to get a pay and allow the that half to stay at home.
That "on average" is load bearing, does it include Queen Victoria? Just like ICE "allows" people to stay at Aligator Alcatraz. They should be paying rent!
Of course, the indentured servants payed rent in kind, with their bodies, whether they like it or not.
Say whaat? The woman's father literally paid good money to have her taken away. Everyone but the woman saw cash changing hands, but she was legally barred from owning property.
I don't think so, they would be crushed and bought out by the bigger American Oligarchs. By liting their influence, their local monopoly remains unbeatable.
